Clinton Vs. Trump

Clint Vs Trump what a difficult decision

Neither candidate can be trusted and yet short of a brokered Republican convention one of them will become the next president. A third party candidate is out of the question at this late date – so what to do?


Hotwater

 

Trump is a buffon but my opinion is that he will get voted in and delegate his authority. He wants to run the country not deal with the intricacies. Maybe a good or bad thing, I don't know.

HRC will just keep the war train turning over:continue Obamas cause (not a good thing), keep the separation of people in motion and basically keep the establishment well paid and happy.

Trump is hated by both; time will tell if that is a good thing or not.

Cruz is also hated among both parties; possible hook up there.

This Pres race is just a big joke on the American people and the world; whoever wins, it doesn't matter, we all lose in the end.

 

Not familiar with the Moody Blues but here is one for anyone thinking of HRC, from the great Cream:



She's some kind of demon messing in the glue
If you don't watch out it'll stick to you, to you
What kind of fool are you?
Strange brew, kill what's inside of you

 

The 'hate' as you refer or criticism to which I prefer is warranted to both.

You act as though they are the only black and women that has made any accomplishment. If they are the only ones warranted of your 'admiration' then you are just as blind as everyone else that has dawned the horse blinders.

The atmosphere of 'hate' as you say has been caused by them; can you not see the segregation throughout America let alone the world in the last few yrs?

I never classed myself as a hippie( class is just accepted segregation) nor do I 'need' to know the inner workings of the Moody Blues.

It seems some on here have not left the 60's way of thinking. Sometimes the past is just that; the past. To be honest, radicalism really didn't do much then and will not today. Look at how long the BLM lasted. Only until the truth and errors of their 'cause' came to the forefront, does it now seem to be extinguished of its influence. People realized their cause was for themselves, not for the better union of people throughout America.

You can blame Bush all you want but Obama has, Syria, Benghazi, Egypt, Yemen, ISIS, the Iran Deal, drone killings, illegal spec op usage, obvious disregard to the Constitution and its founding fathers, NSA and IRS over stepping constitution boundaries, Segregation of the masses, taxpayer spending which exceeds all past US presidents combined, overuse or better yet abuse of surveillance systems and on and on it goes, when it stops, well soon it will. Look at his staff placements, all some way or another tied to the media.

Obama is good with the talk and can convincingly blame everyone else; Hillary is just mockingly and blatantly obvious in her shady dealings and the US voters are too blind to see it.

 

Actually there has been alot of links for you of our points. Perhaps you should open yourself enough to click on the links.

 

Intriguing comparison but I'm not sure what hipforummers would think of Jimbo as president (if that would be a possibility). Maybe we need a thread called Jim Morrison vs. Hillary Clinton?

 

Hippies are so 1960s.

 

Yeah that's a good point. It's more like if Jim Morrison were running against Katy Perry for president and people on a hippie forum were choosing Katy Perry.

 

Jim Morrison has been dead for quite a while now. And Katy Perry has one hell of a cleavage.

So there's that.

 

You do realize that all you listed is a common side affect of being famous, especially for political and controversial reasons, right?

 

Jim would have my vote......

 

A musician as President? Probably worse than an actor. We tried that once.

 

Amateurs don't count.

Obama has a good voice.

 

i don't think katy perry is old enough to be president. write in henry rollins.

 

But is he a saint to you and the democrats?

 

But they don't remember what he actually did,,, Just what they thought he did.