Clinton Vs. Trump

http://www.sott.net/article/314861-Wikileaks-2012-Killary-email-Secure-Israeli-hegemony-destroy-Syria


If anyone can read this and still stand by HRC, then there is some real blindness in America.

 

I would vote for Jim's dead body over Katy Perry for president.

But seriously, Bernie is a relic of the sixties. He was there living the life that hippies are so nostalgic for. On the other hand we've got Hillary, who is undeniably a corporate shill. I don't understand how you got to this website if you support Hillary over Bernie.

 

Bernie Panders is just another fraud who panders to minorities and special interest groups. That's why he squashed efforts to audit the Fed. He talks about Wall Street and the 1%, but says nothing about the Federal Reserve and the .001% who control that private institution which is the mother of all banks and thus ALL corporate corruption in the US AND ABROAD. Bernie Sanders is simply a disgusting person put out there to appease all the pseudo-intellectual liberals and brainwashed college kids who have been indoctrinated by their professors with all this communistic rhetoric which merely pretends to be anti-establishment. Bernie Panders is just as entrenched in the establishment as Hillary. And like Donald Trump, he talks the talk while not actually walking the walk. I say fuck Bernie Sanders. He is just another one of these people who, like Trump, is given to those who are disillusioned with the way things currently are and looking for a change which is never going to come. I would not vote for Bernie Panders any more than I would vote for Hillary or Donald... even if I thought it mattered.

 

Yes, there is some real blindness in America. There is a lot of it on this website, too.

 

Not exactly. I'm just talking about perception. Everyone famous has a band of lovers and haters. This is especially the case in politics as it seems impossible to have a controversy-free political career for anyone who takes up that profession. Frankly, I don't give a shit if they're democrat or republican as it's just divisive bullshit for the most part.

 

Succinctly stated.

 

http://thehill.com/policy/finance/265556-sanders-to-back-audit-the-fed-bill

pressed rat, I think you've just grown too accustomed to dragging politicians through the dirt. Bernie is the real deal.



Oh look at this terrible pseudo-intellectual liberal. You're just too lazy to vote and making up bad excuses not to.

 

So, just because somebody is old doesn't mean they can't be deceived like everyone else.

Yes, Sanders DID initially back the audit the Fed bill. Then at the last minute he back-peddled and did not support the full provisions for a full and open audit.

 

PR, when did Bernie vote against auditing the Federal Reserve? I looked it up and the only thing I found was that Rand Paul and Sanders cosponsored, and voted in favor of, legislation requiring an audit?

 

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-01-12/democrats-kill-rand-pauls-audit-the-fed-bill-though-sanders-votes-yes

Bernie voted yes to auditing the fed, pressed rat. I don't know where you're getting your information from, but if there was another bill that he rejected, I'm willing to bet it was on good grounds, because he pretty much always has a good explanation for why he rejects a bill that seems good otherwise. Immigration reform and gun control, for instance.

 

Actually you're both right. Bernie did vote in favor of Audit the Fed this year when almost all the other democrats voted no. But in 2010 when audit the fed was up for a vote, Sanders did originally work with Ron Paul to get it passed in the senate, but then switched at the last minute and watered it down, nullifying the whole bill. He has flip flopped on Audit the Fed.

http://www.politicalcure.com/2015/09/02/bernie-sanders-destroyed-audit-the-fed-bill/

 

I did some research on the 2010 vote and from what i can tell, Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders both knew legislation for a full fed audit would never pass. Ron Paul wanted to push it through anyways to call out anyone who voted no. Bernie wanted to be more pragmatic so voted no and then pushed for a more watered down legislation so it would actually pass.

and he did vote for a full audit this year

 

Do you believe everything you read?

 

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/03/elizabeth-warren-mops-the-floor-with-trump-on-twitter-lets-be-honest-donald-trump-is-a-loser/

 

It's clear that the term "loser" has morphed into something I no longer recognize. Why would she use such a sophomoric label? Maybe she's gunning for VP!

 

Well I found the congressional hearing on Sanders' bill which was, according to Ron Paul, a watered down version of his original bill.

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2010-05-06/pdf/CREC-2010-05-06-pt1-PgS3303-3.pdf

Begins on page 26. Just read what Sanders is saying. His amendment called for the Fed to reveal where two trillion dollars it lent out went. Do you think this wouldn't have revealed anything about the Fed? I didn't read Ron Paul's bill, but Sanders makes explicit that his doesn't include telling the Fed how to manage its money, which I imagine is what Ron Paul objected to. But it doesn't need to do that, because if the American people had found out what happened to that two trillion dollars, it most likely would have been all over for the Fed and any bill Ron Paul wanted to pass to audit the Fed would have then passed. Sanders was just being pragmatic, as always, as far as I can tell.