Circumsized or uncircumsized?

Good for you Ron, I'm cut and am very sad about it - it's mutilation.

And for someone posting earlier it is not true that most Europeans are uncut - huge numbers are. It definitely desensitises the head of the penis, especially when it spends most of it's life rubbing on material, underwear or worse - commando - rubbing on denim!

Some of the reasoning for cutting was because of the high level of STDs in the past, cleanliness and the moral Victorian aspect of stopping boys from masturbating too easily.

Simon

 

What help does a vaccine do? It can save lives, or at least help you when your sick. Having your genitalia chopped off like Sweeney Todd the demon genital cutter of fleet street doesn't help. You may say it keeps it less dirty and can prevent STD but a Baby doesn't have to worry about getting STD when he is 1 month old, to be honest. If you want to be circumsised do it to the child when he is old enough to think. about baby circumsiion btw.

 

Cut and don't care what I'm missing.

 

cut but I wont get my child cut if I have one

 

Uncut, and I do think circumcision is very wrong. If its cut it looks disgusting, and it's like having sex with a doorknob.

 

Cut - Door knob beats a folded umbrella all day long.

 

hahahahhahahahahah

 

I am uncut and thank god for that...masturbation and sex is more enjoyable. When you are cut, you dont know what you miss....

 

if you've never been cut, how do you know?

 

Cut and glad I am...:2thumbsup:

 

I think I know why cut penises look better. Everyone can agree there's nothing more depressing than a flaccid dick, and a cut one even when flaccid gives off more of the illusion of being erect.

 

why cant I get past page 63 of this thread? I can see theres more, but I always get directed back to pg 63

 

There is nothing past page 63(64 now), some threads just fuck up how many pages there are. This thread has been going for a long time and its been heated at times, some posts may have been removed some time ago for being inflammatory which is why the page numbers fuck up.

 

ahhh...thanks....I thought it seemed weird showing 70 pages....

 

Circumcision-decreasing penis size and making it LOOK marginally larger:2thumbsup:

 

Wait how would circumcision reduce penis size, especially since the foreskin doesn't cover the head of an uncut penis when erect.

 

Grab hold of an erect, uncut dick, and you'll see...

When it's not over the head, it's over the shaft... it's not like the skin just isn't there, there's quite a bit of it....

It's not just a "little snip" on an "inconsequential" piece of skin, and if you take away mass, there's.... guess'ut... less mass.

 

would you really inflict the pain of circumcision to a BABY. just for the "illusion of being erect". if so then i would question your ability to be a parent.

 

here is how its simple. if you take something away without putting any back it it gets smaller. if you cut the foreskin off. then the foreskin cant retract and or give room for expansion and girth is also reduced. this is basic logic. here i will simplify it for you if you have 3 apples and someone takes 1/2 of 1. you have 2, 1/2 not 3 anymore. the body works the same. if you remove the foreskin it won't grow back and the penis gets smaller.

 

Faulty reasoning - the body is not covered in an inflexible sheath that is unforgiving. It stretches - take a pinch of skin off the top you your hand and pull upward - ta-tah - it gives. Much more so the penis where the skin is far more easily stretched. If anything, the sheath of skin over the penis is tauter when cut, thus giving more intimate contact. To think that the loss of skin would cause a smaller penis is ludicrous - If sufficient skin is not there - the body grows more. Ever see a large person with their shirt off?