Circumsized or uncircumsized?

There is one, it's either a different thread in this forum, or it might be in the love and sex forum.

 

But that's because most posters here are american. In Europe most men are uncircumcised (fortunately! Prefer those).

 

It's good.

 

its all a matter of opinions...which i am grateful we all have.

 

If only penis owners' opinions were assessed more often before parts were lopped off.

-Ron

 

I dunno. I heard it is possible to reverse a circumcision. I'll have to look into it to be sure, though.

But if it can be done, would you do it?

 

ewwww....would they put someone else's forskin on your penis??? hahha gross!

 

No.

It's called "non-surgical foreskin restoration" and hundreds of thousands of guys are doing it. They just tension the surviving skin until it grows longer so it can act like a foreskin.

This gives back protection for the mucosal parts so these can shed their dry surface and be supple and sensitive again. It also lets the skin tube slink around during intimacy, providing a plush rolling/gliding feeling and allowing the specialized nerve endings in the shaft skin to fire off pleasure signals as they seem designed to do - when the skin bends and re-straightens.

Restoration will not bring back the 20,000 or so lost specialized nerve endings but it lets the ones that are left work much better. It's easy and painless, but you can only add about 2mm - 6mm of skin tube length per month and cut males are typically missing about 80mm of skin length.

There is also a move afoot to apply regenerative medicine techniques (as have been used recently to help wounded soldiers re-grow lost bodily tissues) toward helping men recover from infant foreskin amputation. That has not been attempted yet. It would require surgical removal of the existing circumcision scar and leave 2 or possibly 3 incision lines in place of one. It's not at all clear whether the brain would know what to do with potential pleasure signals from re-grown body parts. The brain undergoes a lot of development in infancy, forging strong pathways to carry signals that are present, and re-purposing brain portions that don't get expected stimuli.

-Ron

 

That's the stupidest fucking thing I've ever heard of.

 

How the fuck would they manage to do that? If your cock is cut, it's cut, doesn't seem like you can really go back.

What if they fuck it up or something? Then you have a scarred, misshapen penis. I dunno why parents don't just leave it alone at birth to begin with.

 

"non-surgical foreskin restoration"

I think you need to get out more. There's a whole world of stupidity waiting to be discovered. Like non-therapeutic genital cutting, for example.

Foreskin (even restored foreskin) feels REALLY good.

It's a lot of work to expand your surviving skin, and there is no evidence that we can regenerate the lost specialized pleasure receptors known as Meisner's Corpuscles. The specialized layer of shear muscle cells at the preputial sphincter also do not regenerate.

The restored skin may not be original equipment, but restoring is nonetheless very worthwhile. Restoring gives radically different feelings. Among them:

- the shaft can now be frictionlessly kneaded by the slinking of the skin, to prod some sense sites deep within the shaft near the glans and elsewhere. I never knew this was possible before I restored. I suppose with enough lube I might have discovered the same thing earlier before I had slack skin.

- the mucosal skin just below the glans down to the scar has a sort of ticklish "itch" that just sparkles during intercourse or oral stimulation. The area was dry and basically numb before.

- the corona and frenular area are just a lot more sensitive/ticklish now that they are covered all the time. Some have said it's due to "dekeratinization" and others have said there's no such thing. All I know is I feel A LOT more now. It's like the nerve endings are closer to the surface, and the surface is more supple and delicate so it tracks better with the fine detail of whatever it's touching. It's like going from wearing 3 thick condoms to a single ultra-shear one. Anybody can experience the same change by wearing a band-aid continuously for several days on any part of their body. When you take it off, the part that had been covered is very sensitive and ticklish.

- the skin at the pucker of the prepuce is very ticklish to tongue flicking when it is bunched up. Since I didn't have enough to bunch up before, I never felt this sensation.

- the inner foreskin is delightfully aware of a tongue plunged in between the glans and foreskin and swirled around (with skin drawn forward over the glans). Since I didn't have enough slack before for this to happen, I never felt this sensation until I had slack.

- the shaft skin that has spent its whole day puckered in front of the glans gives off a wild sensation upon the onset of an erection. It's like the skin crackles inside as it is forced to stretch wide enough to clear the glans and retract past it, while it also has to overcome the grip of the tacky clinging adhesion to the glans. It's like both glans and skin are kissing each other. This is brief and I really only notice it for the first couple minutes of an erotic encounter, but that's OK. If it kept up I'd probably climax too fast. I imagine this might be akin to what it feels like to have a vagina stretched out. I can only guess about that of course.

- the shaft skin that rolls up and down the shaft gives off a new feeling as it rolls over on itself from inner to outer and back. Since I never had enough slack before to feel the skin tightly rolling like this during arousal I never felt this sensation before.

- with the slack skin sufficient to easily cover my glans during arousal, my wife can rub my glans through the skin before intercourse while I'm licking her, and there is ZERO risk of her rubbing me to the point of numbness, no matter how long we keep at that activity. Before dry friction directly on my glans would really have a negative impact on the intercourse that followed.

- after my wife climaxes once during intercourse her vaginal chemistry seems to change to where there is suddenly more friction. Not a LOT more; just like the difference between lube that's water-based and lube that's oil-bsed. At that time, I often feel my penis move inside my sheath of skin only, with ZERO friction between me and her vaginal walls. She LOVES this, because she says at that moment she would be too sensitive for any friction. Because I never had slack before, she was never able to enjoy this plush filled-up frictionless massage feeling between orgasms before. Of course when we're finally done, this same action causes her vagina to pull my skin so my glans is actually covered as I withdraw, which is a trip.

Sex wasn't torture before. At age 38 my wife and I would make love for like 45 minutes or an hour. She would climax about 5 times and if I wanted to finish I needed to REALLY concentrate and she needed to break out the dirty talk and the stars needed to align. But she would be utterly rubbed raw and then want to take several days off from intimacy.

She never did succeed in finishing me orally before I restored.

Now whenever she's had enough during intercourse I just let go and finish as she climaxes again with me. But the whole ride is so fulfilling, I'm in no rush to get to a big finish. We really connect, and have intercourse more often than ever.

Sex is very much better since restoration, for physical reasons. We're both having the best sex of our lives despite 19 years of familiarity.

-Ron

 

bullshit

 

Then don't hire Lorena Bobbitt to do the job....?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGPhUr-T6UM

 

"Sex is very much better since restoration, for physical reasons."

Skepticism is good. Why not ask any of the 1000s of other restorers about it so you don't have to take just my word:

http://Foreskin-Restoration.net/forum

http://www.MyForeskin.org/

http://RestoreForeskin2.org/

http://www.RestoringForeskin.org/

 

I don't need to ask. I find it to be pathetic. Borders on mental illness.

 

"non-surgical foreskin restoration" - just ask the men doing it.

That's just a remarkably silly and closed-minded attitude, devoid of compassion. Irrational.

Here we have men who have suffered an involuntary amputation of healthy normal body parts. In most cases they haven't just permanently lost a valuable pleasure receptor, they are also disfigured in ways the butcher never even intended.

By some miracle they have discovered inexpensive and painless methods to effectively undo some of the damage. This affects nobody other than the man who benefits; not a soul is harmed, although their partners proclaim benefits.

And what about that is a manifestation of mental illness? Is it the "taking stock of past events and rationally taking action to plot a brighter future" part? Or is it perhaps the "not hunting down the barber who cut them and gutting him like a fish" part? Or maybe the "getting over the greif of loss and taking back control of ones own destiny" is what bothers you?

The answer is obvious. Genital cutting is insane.

It creates denial and hostility in some of its victims. Here's hoping they can get over it and move ahead.

 

nah you guys are just really insane and neurotic

 

Wow...I didn't know that was actually possible. Well kudos to you, Tugger. I never would have guessed.

 

Imagine being obsessed over the tip of one's penis to such an obsessive degree that you'd actually let someone mess with it. As a circumsized man I have never experienced anything but the most exquisite pleasure and I've yet to meet anyone who claims otherwise.

But we're the one's who have hostility and need to move ahead? Move ahead to having a really pointless and stupid procedure done that will uglify our members in the ridiculous hope that it MIGHT feel marginally more exquisite sometime later?

What's next for you feebs? Auto-asphixiation?

Pathetic.

 

@ darkblue;

I'm pretty positive that the fact remains you are unable to maintain an open mind about this. How is cutting off natural skin at birth any better than attempting to restore it as a man?