Circumcision

no you follow, that was it.
my comment was more for other people who try to say definitely what it is like to be one way or the other, when the truth is nobody can know for sure because nobody can experience life with both.

 

Gotcha!

 

Interesting, I haven't been here for over a year or more. Same discussion. Everybody is entitled to an opinion. The fact remains; it doesn't matter what you think. Cutting normal healthy tissue off of another person without their consent is mutilation. Consider the varied opinions here. So clearly we just can't make that decision for others, be it our child or not. It is an inconvenient truth.

I find not being circumcised to be a blessing. I know when I make love to my Lover that the sensations we both experience is exactly what nature intended. I consider myself lucky. I can't help feel there is a level of intimacy that is lost to couples when the man is cut. It's science. Important, highly sensitive tissue is lost. As an intact man, the sensation of my foreskin being pushed back and penetration with my women is so very intimate.

There has been times when I had to leave my lover. Having her fluid under my skin allowed me to feel (remain) connected with her. I told her that and she tells me knowing this is highly erotic for her.

I wish people the best. If you are a male that has be circumcised you simply need to except it. Nonetheless we all have a responsibility to think. To act responsibly. Don't impose your bias on others. As I said; its an inconvenient truth.

 

I have been cut due to heath reason in my teens. Im comfortable with my exposed penis and so is my partner

 

This is my response which I posted on the Sex Polls forum on the same subject.

I have three thoughts on this.

1) This question has been asked so many times on this forum it should just be pinned at the top and should just be one continuous poll question.
2) Arguing which is right is a complete waste of time. No one is going to change another's mind on the subject. Someone prefers cut? Great! Uncut? That's great, too!
3) I happen to prefer circumcised...but who the hell cares?

 

The fact of the matter is there are people who do care. Ask the men whom are trying to restore their foreskins. That may not be an issue to you but to them it obviously is. Something was taken from them without their consent. Period, and that is not an arguable point.

However you are correct about one thing. You said; 3) I happen to prefer circumcised...but who the hell cares? You are correct. Nobody cares.

I happen to hate tattoos. But again who cares. The fact that I happen to hate tattoos is completely subjective on my part. I do however support the right of others to get tattoos. You may get yourself tattooed head to toe. It's really none of my business. I would however object to someone tattooing a baby only because it is in someone else's wishes. Including the parents.

 

Circumcision is NEVER the answer. In the case of phomosis, all that is required is a small "Dorsal Slit."
The head is supposed to be Moist and Soft, not hard and calloused.

 

Im jewish, so I didnt have much of a choice.
Given a choice however, as an adult...I would choose cut. Only because i have seen uncut and Im not impressed.
Pig in a blanket.
Just...no.

 

There's nothing wrong with making the choice to be circumcised. That's the whole point behind freedom - the right to choose. Having an infant circumcised denies him that choice.

 

Well I am not Circumcised and I have always been told how good I taste so I don't think it affects hygiene if you look after your cleaning habits.....I think a lot of guys probably think its the norm to be cut...cos the vast majority of porn actors are cut.....But I go along with what others say....Its a personal choice of your own body.....Like Tattoos or whatever.....I'm happy with my todger in one piece.

 

I would suggest that was a typo. Perhaps it was meant to read as "Appalling".

Isn't it ironic that the vast majority of civilised countries find the question of Female Genital Mutilation as being totally abhorrent, but accept, condone & even encourage the same thing being done to their male babies.

All babies start life as female. It's only after a while of gestation that the Y chromosome kicks in & begins to change sex. Therefore, we all have the same organs - they just have a different appearance or function. Technically, the clitoris is the same as the male glans. Bearing this in mind, you ladies consider how you might feel about having your clitoral hood, which is, when all said & done, the same thing as the male foreskin, removed at birth, leaving it to wither away to something resembling a dried, wrinkled prune, calloused with barely any feeling left in it. Consider that before subjecting your son to irreversible sexual mutilation.

Infant circumcision is nothing less than Child Abuse, both Physically & Sexually. I hope it eventually becomes possible for a Son to sue their parents for compensation. That would set a precedent that would make parents think twice.

 

How does it feel to be wrong?

 

PineMan is correct.

It's amazing how those pro circumcision just seem to ignore the very clear, logical points made here. They cannot and will not except what they read. It so emotional and engrained in them. Interesting and yet sad.

 

I honestly feel like this justification of "it doesn't look right with skin" to be absolutely absurd. It was there for a reason, you're born with it for a reason. It doesn't take too long at all to flush under the skin and clean it so I read and once erect has the same distinguishable characteristics that a circumcised penis has. To say it looks unnatural?? Circumcised probably looks unnatural to those who haven't been cut and you don't hear them with belligerent belittling comments.. much.

To simply conform to the idea of circumsicion just because that's what you're used to... Why... That almost sounds as ignorant as sticking to the same cultural identity in a friendship circle.

 

Just to piss some people off.

If I ever decide to try bisexual adventure, it'll be with a man who hasn't be circumcised. I'll require a man, not a percentage of one.

 

So he will need a full head of hair and uncut nails too.

 

Oh of course the hair. I'm only attracted to guys with long hair as it is.
The nails? As long as they aren't chewed to death at the moment of impact I wouldn't mind. He can have long nails too.

 

As a grown man I'm glad my parents refused to circumsize me . They were totally against it . I love having extra skin , I'm clean , more sensitive , plus my skin ain't all tight and bearly covers my head . Plus the extra skin makes it great for rubbing one out , no need for lube .