who would wanna get their fucken cock circumcised when they r an adult that would suck o he guys im goin to get my shaft circumcised bbl
.....take showers? Even having done things like sweat in the woods for a week with no proper shower, I can say, it's not much of a thing.... for me, anyways. Maybe for a bit during puberty. That's good, it makes your kid bathe, if he wants his dick sucked
The thing is that smegma is actually a beneficial, anti-bacterial substance, and as with most things in the body, has an important function: http://www.foreskin.org/smegma.htm
#1 dark suger Dripping With Sin! Join Date: Jun 2008 ------------------------- Circumcision ? ------------------------------------- No thanks, already had one-
You make a valid point, but parents often make health decisions for their infant children, such as vaccinations, taking tonsils out, and circumcision. And circumcision is harder to do the older the child gets, and can be more traumatic. 10% or so of male infants ultimately have problems retracting their foreskins, and infant circumcision eliminates the need for a later operation when the problem becomes evident. And why hide the best part?
Lol. You compare circumcision to vaccinations and tonsil surgery, and then you go on to note that one issue with circumcision is that it is traumatizing to the child, unlike either of the things you compared it to. It shouldn't be an issue of how traumatized you want your child to be from mutilating his penis. You should just try not to traumatize your child, IMO. I think the large majority of the problem with retracting foreskins is that ignorant parents think that they have to do it prematurely to clean it, which is simply not true. I seriously doubt that 10% of uncircumcised infants develop phimosis naturally. From wikipedia:
My own phimosis developed from a cycling injury, which went on to build up layer upon layer of scar tissue, which gradually tightened the foreskin as it thickened. As far as I'm concerned unless they, themselves, are medically qualified, parents have no right to make the decision to have their children unnecessarily mutilated, regardless of the reason. While it is true that the foreskin may not retract at first, that's simply because it's not meant to until around the age of puberty, when the boy is, at least, approaching the age when he's mature enough to make the decision for himself.
just read a new article that said doctors found that circumcision is well worth the risk and benefits but said that it is up to the parents to decide what they want for their child. "we wont say that you should get your son circumcised." was the quote from a doctor that said "benefits outweigh the risks" so pretty much this will go on being an argument for the forskinable future.
so thats the motivation behind the masterpice painting called the scream. Just think what its like to have your clit cut if you happen to be of muslim descent living in africa or the middle east were it is considered a rite of passage.
ok so this conversation is nothing new so let me ask a whole new group of people what was said on a different site. one person said those nerve endings are great pleasure another person said im glad im circumcised because i last longer in bed being im not being stimulated as much the first person said that besides having greater pleasure, uncircumcised people also last longer in bed. now does that even make sense? to me if your stimulated your cumming. at least thats my experience. and i have yet to see proof otherwise.
basically, whatever the person speaking has is better in every possible way, including those that have absolutely nothing to do with presence or absence of foreskin. that's why these conversations never go anywhere.
go visit baby viewing room at hospital and watch the screams when they cut. then look at THE SCREAM painting.