CIA mind control. *Graphic Content*

ginalee

You repeated yourself:

'I believe that it is the responsibility, duty and obligation for "the government" to answer to the people and inform, intelligibly (in a language anyone can understand), just what exactly those chemtrails are.'

'It is the responsibility, duty and obligation of the government to answer to the people, in regard to chemtrails. Period.'

And again now:

'It is the responsibility, duty and obligation of the authority ("the government") to inform the people.'

NO. I wonder where you think they are, and where the evidence for them is.
In particular, what you consider to be a 'chemtrail' - giving details.
Not a link to the never ending Google debate via Google.

I have already said this numerous times.

Yes, I am aware of the various forums. And?
I have already said that they tend to say/do the same thing.
Post pictures like this:



Or harp on about HAARP - never actually mentioning you can go visit there.

I have said this several times.

I may have missed the weather modification site you posted.
I do not dispute there has been weather modification projects.
This does not really equate with the endless pictures on chemtrail websites that post pictures like this:

One thing at a time.

Repeating yourself, again.

Like I said: Please read previous posts. All responses already uttered.

 

Yep, that's me.

Our shared idiocy.

Terrible thing to say.

Terrible!

Here it comes ...

Yawn.

Want a link to the chemtrail forum? Can't post it, sorry. You'll have to Google it yourself.

Shared idiocy, apparently.

Wow. People. What're ya gonna do.

I'm not talking about HAARP.

Cool pic. It's like artwork for the sky.

We are both quite rich in time, apparently.

Shared idiocy.

I've read all you had to say. So far, the only honest thing I've read from you is this:

:sunny:

 

You said it, not me.

You said it, not me.

You said it, not me.

Exactly. You said it, not me.

No. YOUR evidence.

I never said you were.

Nobody disputes weather modification projects.

 

This here's what I call stupefaction.

Anyway, you didn't dissolve the conspiracy odon. Better luck to you, next time.

By the way, I'm off to the chemtrails forum to deposit my most recent discovery. Gonna be fun!

 

Never my intention. You just evaded the very simple question. YOUR evidence.

 

Like I said, I know your game. I know how you are, I know how you play.

Step aside, people of planet Earth! Master odonII is going to dissolve the chemtrails conspiracy, for one and all!

You just have to feed him. lol

 

Let me guess what that will be:



No context.

 

I play no games. You have no idea who I am. Again, I do not play. I asked a very simple question. I think from the first post. Maybe from the second.

 

'kay. We done yet?

Let's talk about strawberries, lmao

 

I think we were done around 26 hours ago.

 

You are using the same logic that creationists use. Because 100% proof/evidence can not be provided then any previous data can not be trusted and must be false. So the only alternative is to believe your side of the story whose data is even more sparse and less credible. Like evolution conspiracy theories do have "missing links". But that does not mean they are false. It means we have not found those links.

 

I should know not to get into spiral conversations like that - but, I'm the eternal optimist, and hope it will go better than it invariably does.

 

here is someone who confirmed Cathys story, with other experiences...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGEYloihE9g"]Illuminati Whistleblower "They Worship lucifer" - YouTube

 

How interesting is it that conspiracy and chemtrail are not the same word?

 

Not interesting at all. What is interesting is that chemtrails are very different from contrails, and the world still begs to know.

 

The interest for me lies in the fact when asked for verification of specific phenomena including place and date you provide in return there were just so may entries beginning with the word conspiracy. Not the information that was requested or information even pertinent to the question.

I am not saying that chemicals are not sprayed from aircraft or that there are not insidious airborne pollutants. Obviously there are crop dusters and there has been insecticide spraying over populated areas. I remember a county program to fight an infestation of tent moths, and cloud seeding, the use of defoliants and fire retardants. There is a danger obviously from synthesizing and using chemicals and there are agents that do so specifically to the detriment of living things like the arms industry and municipal road crews. No doubt there are testing programs to understand environmental effects of all kinds of substances. Then there are chemical spills like Bhopal and the gulf war oil fires. Start by naming them specifically because when you start with the word conspiracy every example becomes an example of conspiracy. Each time you document a specific instance and it's reasons the conspiracy case is exposed as some kind of arrogance about the capacities of people to control things in a coordinated fashion.

Not enough is understood of atmospherics to be able to control climate or most importantly, contain fallout at a meaningful level and it there is documentation of coordinated world wide efforts not to exacerbate but to improve the situation like the banning of chlorofluorocarbons and requiring emissions scrubbers...
and stuff

 

Chem trails... Old news. Fukushima killing us, probable. Just thought I'd add that to your nuclear fallout comment.

 

thedope, the information is in those 2.9 million results. There are ENDLESS sites and blogs that are loaded with all sorts of information. There are even forums (that's plural). Like I said to odon, he wanted info put on his plate bit by bit FOR HIM (that's called feeding a troll). To engage him about the matter of chemtrails would be a troll-like conversation. I pointed to the (abundant) information. It is up to other people to GO LOOK for themselves. I'm not going to feed it to anybody and I'm not going to play these stupefying mind games.

 

Fukushima is actually somewhat relevant to chemtrails because it is thought that chemtrails are a form of "protection" from solar / galactic activity (and weakening of the magnetosphere, that sort of stuff). But, chemtrails could also be a response to harm / damage resulting from decades of nuclear tests (or in the case of Fukushima, and Chernobyl, a response to an accident). Chemtrails are a hypothesized mitigating of damages, be it solar or nuclear.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests

Simple logic: if they test nuclear weapons, who in their right mind could possibly think that chemtrails are not something very similar to nuclear weapons tests?

And, the world begs to know.

 

And according to you they can find out.