Child Molesters

yes deranged, love for a child is a natural thing, but not sexual love... children need other types of love before they are ever mature enough to cope with a physical, sexual relationship with an adult...

you view the views of people who oppose your views as prejudiced... but, what you think is ok to do, has an extremely high chance of damaging vulnerable, immature human beings... i have NEVER come across anyone who has been taken advantage of like that and thought it was alright!!! it's not prejudiced, it's just a natural sense that what you deem as ok, is most definitely NOT OK because the therepy rooms prove it... they are bursting at the seems!!!

would like to add a footnote: this all depends very much on what we each deem a paedophile... the law says one thing and there seem to be variations amongst the rest of us... my personal view, in a very broad sense, is that a paedophile is an adult who has sexual relations with a minor of 14 or below... i think there are grey areas... for example, a 14 year old and a 16 year old should be able to share consenting sex without fear of prosecution... and children of the same age, if they are 13 or under, should be able to sexually experiment with each other, and as their parents, aunties and uncles, we should be making them feel that they can talk about these matters in a safe, loving environment... matters such as this need to be handled delicately and on a case by case basis.... well, that's my opinion anyway...

 

very well put.LOVE for a child,& LAYING with a child are 2 entirely different things.If you love a child,take em fishing,hiking,horseback riding,play catch,hell,even help em with homework.don't be trying to put your dick in em.

 

Of course not.. but would they!!..and whatever difference does it make to the victim even if they do??

 

Yesterdays paper,Register -Guard,Eugene=A man in a green van pulled up to a 6 year old child and said "get in --your dad told me to come and get you". The child had been taught correctly--he ran. The fuckers are everywhere and children need to be taught like this one was. Now I'll be looking at every green van more closely. I have a six year old grand-daughter and if anything of this nature ever happened to her--well,lets just say that my job in life would thereafter be to find the person and he would not be happy when I did.

 

we just had a 4yo kidnapped right near where I live.you wouldn't think it would happen in a small community like this,but it did.luckily,the child was found wandering around a gas station,unharmed except for a haircut.when they found the shitbag,he offed hisself.& get this,they found a gun used in a murder just a few weeks prior in the guys house.at least his sorry ass didn't waste taxpayer money waitin for somebody in prison to kill him.I love the missouri prison system.sex offenders usually seem to "die of natural causes" in jail.guess if your head's busted open,you naturally gonna die lol.

 

If you rape a child they should put you in the gas chamber. Simple. as. that.

 

In ancient china, 13 was actually quite old.

 

Here in Oregon,a 16 year old raped and killed a 5 year old girl the other day. They're going to try him as an adult ,but no death penalty because he's under 18. He won't live a week in prison and I guess that's a good thing. I personally would like to see him live a looooonnnnngggg time and get himself repeatedly raped and beat to shit day after day for years. Or let the mom and dad have at him with a tire iron.I'd kill him myself and take the karma gladly. He committed the worst crime possible .

 

I'd probably do the same myself if I had to put up with a kids whinging.

 

and your point is?

 

For me, this is one of the few things that I have no give on. I have no mercy for anyone who molests.

I also have no confidence in the legal system with regards to these crimes nor the punishment that is given.

 

i have no confidence in them either because i believe so many who make and uphold those laws are paedophiles themselves and worse.... actual child molesters!

 

and your point is?

 

That state of the art empires better than industrialized governments in today's unions succeeded for thousands of years breeding through young children.
Why is breeding with 13 year olds wrong? Because priests say so?

 

because when a childs body gives birth, it physically damages them... the bladder tears and they need surgery... that's ONE very good reason don't you think?...

 

Nope. Worked miraculously well as far as I'm concerned. You probably wouldn't have been born if it never happened. Ponder this.

 

That was a time when girls were only for breeding. I personally think that today, there are far more productive things that they should be doing at 13.

 

it's a fact... still happens today to many poor girls who give birth too young... then, because they permanently drip urine, they are no longer considered beautiful and are abandond by their child molesting husbands...

 

Breeding is a little different than molestation but in this era girls are starting to hit puberty at ages 8 and 9. So if you're physically able to carry children 5 years later I don't exactly see how that can be illegal or why it should be illegal. Not that any or this gets me off or pushes my arousal buttons. XD

 

Are you a pedophile or child molester?