Betrothal and arranged marriages the modernization?

For politicians I think voters go for candidates who are married because voters feel that by being married they could have an easier time understanding problems that affect them from a policy point of view.

you kidding...if you think polliticians care about anything other than themselves and their money...you got not an accurate idea. but yeah i think thats the popular concept
a gender divide.....yeah its like a trophy for the guy ..like how many times you been done a girl..or boy..or whatever
but for a girl its like bad behaviouse to f... round.
this has a very long history based in male models of behavioural regulation.
maybe it had its roots in the Women's Temperance movement somewhere..but in sure the guys didnt object.....i wouldnt.....hay its friday.
im starting a mural painting in a local bar ....i got allot of fun ahead of me..good "clean" fun..lol

 

I think it has its roots in rudimentary explaining where STD's came from.

You cant tell if a guys been cheating unless he gets caught but a woman you can tell, via hymen being gone or a pregnant belly with a kid that doesnt look like the husband. (i'm talking long ago here)


I'm just theorizing why voters go for married politicians, i'm not saying it makes logical sense at all.

But i should point out that good politians are trying to get big $ out of their line of work, so they can't all be 100% bad.

 

yeah..in short if you’re a guy and have screwed round you’re a "StUd".....if you’re a girl...you’re a SlUt.

i would like to track down the origins of this mindset....i could be an interesting thread of research...i bet it has its origins in the Judeo-Christian tradition ......like allot of thought linguistic paradigms.
more to come ..i gotter go out.hungry… any ideas? concidering im Gq....and am fluid in gender......interesting...so what am i?

 

well..i must admit i was “baiting” chauvinist…...sorry bout that.
in more refined language i find the above statement very dated and not really relevant to the situation today.
i think this is a archetypal example of how post modernistic events has out stripped social linguistics.
I am currently attempting to study postmodernity by studying modernism.
This study is seriously geared to my personal understanding of events around me. I live in a deeply troubled ,war torn ,country that paradoxically has a growing young middle class and has a higher that usually projected tourism busness this winter.
The concept is much more complex than my statement with the event of cyberspace, dating and partner institutions, the advances in gender surgery for those who live in a bi gendered social paradigm and of cause mass media.
However in human his/her/ourstory there is a biological underpinning to male and female behavior.
but this gets real trickey as one wonders if allot of social roles are a result of language architectural psychic onstruction.
Where the deconstructionists right?
Was jung right?
I think everything needs to be seen in its social context and biological context to get a clearer picture .
There is allot to this topic..i might do some more digging and see what I come up with.
So the mind continues…. she shouts, she bites, it wrangles through the night.

 

Actually, that's an over exaggeration.

Among guys, guys will pat each other on the back for "playing the field".

But if your a guy among friends who are girls, you will lose respect fast. (provided that those girls who are friends are not suffering from other psychological instabilities from a broken home life or trauma or something)

 

yes i stated in a secondary post a different vector..i was fishing for a conversation..sorry bout that..nice to meet you .
cheers ink8290

 

Cheers! I guess I keep negating where you want to take a conversation lol.

Regardless I'll give you conversation, just I like avoiding over generalities and like mentioning off trends or new, and sometimes taboo, tangents of discussion.