One interesting thing about having multiple identities as a candidate in this competition, though, is that I can't in good concience let seeming open-mindedness and congeniality in one personality carry over into another personality, which means that they can't be penalized in their standings (as peacefulljeffrey has been) for showing intelligence elsewhere in the community. The fact that a separate personality had to be created as a mouthpiece for said candidates idiocy actually gives the mouthpice identity precedence over the others. I call this the "difficulty bonus" for the idiocy score, because it's more work.
Nah, the poor user is giving good commentry like the one's they do at games... please let him/her continue. Please continue!!!
Okay, maybe not an idiot, but certainly wasting his and/or her time with over-analyzing every little thing.
Sorry, doesn't fit the profile. Posts are controvetial, but when a "fact" is presented there's always lot's of documentation. This person does his research and does it well and seems to like exposing others who don't. I think you are just trolling. Nominate someone who fits the profile or don't nominate anyone. Why nominate someone who obviously can't win?
According to your sig, your are the Hip Forums Whore. Thinking of bribing the judges with sex? It might work. You never know until you try.
I was joking. Believe me, I'm not your type (not that that should matter to a whore but it matters to me). Anyway, I'm still accepting nominations for "Biggest Idiot." Got some great candidates, they make for interesting reading, but far from a full field of competitors so far. Keep em coming!
I second that.... There are a bunch of morons here, though... I'm just relieved to see that no one remembered to nominate me.... If you do it now that I've said it, though, you suck...
Wish I could accommodate you, however it appears that blah has been deleted. Note, that's deleted, not just banned, mind you - blah's posts seem to be missing entirely. You don't see that too often (well, I haven't). Wow. Probably for the best. I personally had a bit of a row with this former member; Just resonding to him made me feel dirty - felt like taking about umpteen showers after, and the stench still lingers. That will teach me. I have to break this awful habit I have of feeding trolls (no matter how righteous it feels at the time).
I work feverishly, type my fingers down to bloody stubs and frantically search my little pea brain for the stupidest comment I can think of to all your threads and posts and this is what I get? Not even an honorable mention? I'm disgusted, appalled and downright dismayed by the system as a whole. To hell with y'all!
Sorry Bug_man. Ya gotta have a sponsor. Them's the rules. Ask around. Bird might sponsor you. Or TenCentArcade (he nominated me, after all).
Maybe you could start a thread with that kenny G looking, toe sucking Peaceful Jeffrey and try to outdo each other....I just don't think you have it in you though bug....in fact, I consider you an internet friend, while peaceful Jeffrey is my arch enemy.
I dont belive in awards or this kind of competition. Im not perfect enough to decide on anything, i have'nt the right.
thats it, for that lame post its now between rebel 1 and peaceful jeffrey.... If you are not judgemental, get the fuck out of here!
The public news media has F.A.I.R.(Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting) to act as a watchdog so that they don't get away with pushing bad info or faulty reasoning. No one appointed the people who publish F.A.I.R. and they are not perfect. Despite this, they do a great job and are respected for their efforts. Free speech is the only right they need to do this work. Ditto for myself. Think of this thread as a similar watchdog for the Hip Forums. No one appointed me, true. I'm not perfect, true. But I'm a good researcher and my analysis of each candidate will be as honest and fair as I can make it. Believe what you wish. If you want to search through my old posts for evidence to discredit my analysis, feel free. Ultimately I'm doing this simply to promote stronger critical thinking skills among those who engage in debates on sensitive issues here in the forums. I'd like to get people to stop and really think through their arguments before posting; to make it a habit to research and check their sources before posting "facts" to prove their points; and to check the ever growing spread of disinformation tactics which have become such a huge part of what we are seeing being passed of as factual reporting or research all over the net. I can't watch the whole internet, but this is MY community, I love it here, and I want to do my part to make it the best it can be. People will be able to check this thread and know immediately that if the person they are debating/arguing with is an award winner, then they need to double check everything that person posts, so they won't be misled.