are you circumsized or uncircumsized?

Both my BF and I are cut and wish we were not. Our 'rents did it to us when we were born.

Hugz
Bobby

 

Wow. What an idiot!

 

Uncut and very much happy. Seeing cut penises makes me feel bloody queasy. I don't care if it's healthier, it's much more pleasurable having foreskin, and I like my cock factory condition.

 

Unmutated here

 

It's not actually healthier. The foreskin and it's function is actually very unique and cutting it is retarded.

 

I am mostly uncut. Had some kinda surgery when I was a kid because the skin was attached to the glans but they left most of my foreskin on. I hear if you wait on that it will likely detach by itself, but not everyone knew that in the '40s.

So, my foreskin normally sits halfway down the glans and I got enuf skin to slide back and forth if I wanna.

(Here's a pic - hope this isn't against the rules)
http://home.earthlink.net/~shalestone/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/scorpiopenisshaleuncut.jpg

I am into nature, and don't buy all of Cutted's fanaticism about the dire need to mutilate what seemed to have functioned for thousands of years before we as a species even had cutting tools. In fact, most male mammals have foreskins and they seem to get along OK without circumcision.

I too think it should be considered child abuse to perform an unnecessary mutilation on an infant's penis. If boys want to be circumcised they should do it after an age of consent. We don't even allow tattoos until 18 years.

In the medical realm of risk versus benefit, I would rather risk a UTI or irritation of the glans than to risk having my glans removed in a botched unnecessary cutting. And yes, it happens infrequently but having enjoyed my glans (the most important part of the penis) for six decades, I know what a loss it would be for those few guys it happened to. The risk is not worth the dubious benefit.

 

Not, most of my friends aren't and nobody I knew ever had a problem with their foreskin so I am pretty glad I wasn't cut.

 

speaking for my bf, cut

 

I was born in a navy hospital in the early sixties so I imagine they didn't even ask they just did it. doesn't really matter to me I don't seem to be traumatized from it

 

I was circumsized at birth. I still have a roll of foreskin behind the head when I'm soft.
When I'm hard, I can still use the skin to work over the head when I wack off.
Washing myself is very easy and I have never had a problem with hygiene.
Unfortunatly for my nephew, he needed to be circumsized when he was around 14.
You tell me,.. which would be more dramatic, being circumsized at birth or at 14 years old?
As for myself, I prefure the looks of a cut cock. There is nothing in the way of the view. I also prefure to suck a cut cock.

 

I love my long foreskin!

 

I'm cut, and I was cut earlier this year, yes I was cut at 17 and it bled and hurt like hell for a week afterword.

 

Which is one of the reasons I prefer uncut. I like the mystery, the thrill of slowly sliding that skin back to reveal the growing glans. I also like the little whiff of smegma that can often be smelled on the cleanest guys if you press your nose behind the head. It excites me to do this.

 

The penis, like its sister, the clitoris, is an internal organ. Over the millenia evolution chose to place it outside the body for more efficient use, but covered it with the 4skin to protect it from the elements and the owner. Somewhere we went off half cocked and decided to change its natural condition. The argument for 'looks' is the funniest. It wasn't made to look at. Do those of you who say it looks better parade along the street requesting people to look-see? What nonsense! The vast majority of partners who look upon them see them in their erect condition - out of their skin and excited. Who the hell cares how they look? It is how they work that seems to me a bit more important. Certainly if you are circumcised, you think that's best. You never knew. But those of us with that extra seven square inches of coverage and nerve endings know only too well the benefits of a sensitive head, extra nerve endings galore, and the ease of use both in masturbation and intercourse, without additional lubrication, I might add. If you love your sons and wish them sexual happiness beyond dreams, don't circumcise them. American doctors of the 19th century knew that circumcision dulled sexual joy, and advised parents to cut their sons down to size as a way to prevent masturbation (and of the surgeons to make a few, quick extra bucks.) We still live in their wrong headed and over religious shadow. As for smegma, it accrues only in unwashed and unkempt penises, which I for one have sought to avoid with soap and water. Be happy with what you've got, lads; but you cut guys - make your sons happier. Most circumcisions today merely reflect dad's wish that they both look alike in the shower. How sad..........

 

^ Actually he's not. There is something fucking sick about cutting a piece of skin off of a babies dick.

My man is uncut. THANK THE LORD.

 

I haven't a clue how you extrapolate all this information about Fastswitch from his post on the naturalness of an unmutilated penis.

Perhaps it is because you were mutilated as a baby and now have to always wonder how much better it would be to have a foreskin as nature intended.

Probably some hostility toward your parents here also, which explains the overreaction to an authoritative post which deals primarily with fact.

 

Go Shale You rock buddy. Nice scorpion tat

 

cut and nice

 

incircumcised and proud.

 

Lemme guess. 14 or 15.