This poll is stupid, because it gives no definitions to go by..."pothead" and "stoner" are basically synonyms. Still, I said stoner, on the understanding that it means you like to smoke but aren't absorbed with it.
I am a stoner. I love to smoke, I love being stoned, but I do realize there are other things in my life that matter. I don't enjoy smoking alone though, so when I have it, I only smoke it with my friends.
Pothead!!! Hadn't smoked in a long time(16yrs.) because of the sesitivity of my job. (I drove a truck for a living) But now I am disabled. I will never drive again and now I smoke to calm my nerves and relax. I enjoy smoking that's why I stated pothead. That's what we were called in H.S. 20yrs. ago, I don't like stoner it sounds like a person who works in a Quarry!!! Peace out!!!!
i'd say that i'm more of a stoner, i do smoke like every 2-3 days, but my life doesn't revolve around it
stoners have non-stoner lives? i might think that this kid was trying to make a point about pothead and stoner being the same thing, but after further consitteration...
if you're that into it, and you really wanna dedicate your life to it, then i recomend either selling weed as a proffession (not the better of my two recomendations) or start working in glass molding and that sort of field. you could learn how to make all sorts of neat pipes and bongs and shit.
^^dude its a proven fact and its been posted in government sites and everything that marijuana has never been linked to lung cancer or any other cancer at that fact none have been directly linked to marijuana..because not all but some marijuana users smoke cigarettes alot even when smoking while smoking pot...but those are the ones that get cancer not just regular marijuana users like me...if you dont believe me go look around for that topic and youll see...
You'd have to be an idiot to think that pulling any kind of smoke(including pot smoke) into your lungs and holding it there isn't going to hurt your lungs any. That's SMOKE that's in your lungs buddy, unless you use a vaporizer every time you toke, and I doubt you do.
i know its smoke in your lungs but unlike pot smoke cig. smoke has tar and a bunch more shit that will fuck up your lungs...pot wont give you lung cancer is all im saying...im not saying its healthy or anything...but shit man it wont give you lung cancer
Pot has over 400 chemicals in it...man, I'm starting to scare my self, I'm sounding like one of those damn anti-bud people >.< Sorry about bitching, I wasn't really thinking straight when I posted...
the problem here is that what weve been tought and how we percieve your lungs intuitively in our society, is different to how it really is. tar increases the chance of cancer, in those risking cancer. if theres no cancer element, tar and shit wont affect you. do some research and youll find 0 pieces of scientific information that will confirm that cannabis causes cancer. you can smoke heaps of shit but only radioactivity is going to penetrate the nuclei of your lung cells and modify their DNA in such a way that it will become a growing cancer. in fact, tobacco isnt that bad for you either, if it wasnt fo rthe fertiliser they use. honestly, the amount of people who smoked way back when, they would have diagnosed heaps more deaths from smoking. they didnt even used to have filters.