Anyone else think the moon landing was a fake?

After 25 pages in this thread, I'm beginning to think the moon is fake...

 

I really love how you refuted all fattydash's BS in simple, logical terms,
and you didn't even need to post some monumental fucking wall of text to do it.
:2thumbsup:

 

+rep for the best first post that I have ever seen.

 

It was real. And how do I put this...At that period in time we stood for progress, moving forward, setting goal and achiving them that people were afraid or unwilling to do. We worked to do it first and to do it better. We actually stood for something at that time and people looked up to us.

 

So. The moon LANDING was fake, but the US has been near the moon many times, positioning weapons guidance systems and other advanced material there remotely. Radio signals were genuinely sent from the vicinity of the moon to Parkes in Australia. The US screwed up the cover-up because of who pooped where and who had what medical condition.

Wow. I'm convinced.

 

....and I still haven't had an answer,fattyd.

ALL landings fake,or just the initial one?
In which case all subsequent landings prove the lie,expose the fraud.
Or ALL landings are fraudulent and area 51 is actually a film set?

 

He's moved on to deface Armstrong's obituary on The Economist:

http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2012/08/obituary

Not the sort of attention this forum wants to draw to itself. Just saying.

 

:rofl:
there are even mentions of this thread.

 

No one is trying to defame Neil Armstrong

He became somewhat of a recluse after the fake moon landing, and rarely spoke of the event because he was a man of such integrity that he simply didn’t want to be put in a position to lie to the american public.

How tragic that he was placed in such an untenable position – RIP Neil



Hotwater

 

i dont know, i think they probly were real, but know one will ever truly know for sure

 

Fattydash certainly is. He has turned Armstrong's obituary into a sock puppet fest celebrating his literary genius and toned abdomen. Not exactly cool.

Calling him a liar IS defamation. You have just done that. Putting sugar on bullshit might make it sweeter. but it's still bullshit. Pardon my French.

 

I’ve come up with my own little theory about the moon landing. I’ve always been a non-believer of the first landing. Now many believers will be quick to point out the third party evidence which can be found on Wiki and suggest that this proves the moon landing took place. Unfortunately, however, none of this “evidence” means a thing. All the evidence confirms is that spacecraft was seen, tracked and observed going to and from the orbit of the moon. There is not one shred of evidence to suggest that man actually landed and walked on the moon in the first mission from any of the third party claims. Still we have the NASA footage and photographs but as many hoax enthusiasts will state, they’re all fake anyway and we need third party proof, which can currently only confirm that spacecraft was orbiting the moon.
*
We have been told today that it is possible to land a man on Mars. Instead all the Rovers are sent there to study, sample and collect data just to make sure the place is going to be habitable enough to start terraforming and just to reassure future astronauts that the surface and atmosphere are safe enough to land and walk on.
*
The general consensus and attitude towards the Moon 40 years ago while our own solar system was still relatively unknown was “yeah, we can land a man on the moon”. I don’t believe the astronauts would have been this stupid, to without any training (excluding NASA training, but let’s be honest, no one was ever going to be truly prepared for the unknown) open a hatch and jump out onto the Martian surface.
*
It is much more accepting to me that the first Apollo mission got close, orbited, studied, learned and began to understand how to accomplish the actual landing itself the next time around.
*
I also find it interesting that the majority of the aggressive defenders of the Moon Landing are more or less Americans. Is this because if someone denies it or wishes to not believe, the general surmise is that American itself is being attacked or humiliated? And why is it easier to believe that National Socialist SS officers landed a man on the moon than it is to believe that the same personnel deny any involvement or had any knowledge of the holocaust? Something I know all too well doesn’t sit well amongst the majority of the population.***
*
*

 

I'm not. And I'm a bad tempered cynical son of a bitch to go with it.

The idea that they got THAAAT close, and deliberately didn't land, is farcical. And as I've repeatedly posted, the signal was routed through Australia. Aussies can spot bullshit at a million miles, and no-one in Australia called "fake". Not the guys working on the dish, or the media, or the politicians, or even the virulently anti-American left wing lobby. Remember, this was a time when a lot of Australians thought we were fighting the US' war in Vietnam. They took ANY chance to slag off at "Yanks".

But no-one called it fake. Trust me, if Australians accept it, it's as real as it gets.

 

Well I've lived in Australia and many people believe its fake just like all over the world. Just because the government and officials say it happened doesn't make it so, that's why there's a conspiracy, always revolves around government officials. Australia like several countries tracked the Apollo missions to the moon, orbiting and then coming back to earth. No one from earth physically saw them land on the moon. There's still debates on how far away the moon is from the earth to this very day, I find highly unlikely that the tracking systems of the late 60s could have accurately pinpointed the distances between surface and orbit. All there is is evidence of the orbit if you choose to ignore footage and photos from NASA which could have easily been hoaxed and no one should debate that. It's simply personal opinion whether you think they're real or not, we'll probably never know.
The only concrete third party evidence is orbiting patterns and it'd be pretty silly to assume astronauts never went into space, I don't think moon hoax folk debate that, yet all the evidence revolves around observations of space craft from other observatories.

 

i am an australian, and what you just said is bullshit, i have never heard anyone here think the landings were fake, and if thats what you personally think as well, then you, and all the others have no respect for those men who did go there and who DID walk on the moon.

its a fucken disgrace to think otherwise, we hardly ever talk about it anyway.

R.I.P Niel Armstrong you are a hero, even to an old aussie like me.

 

For Christ sakes they got humans living on mars.

 

I'm born and bred Aussie. I've never met another Australian who thinks it's faked.

Agreed. And just because you say it DIDN'T happen doesn't mean it didn't.

You say that as if it matters. It was physically impossible to see that far in 1969.

No there aren't. Jules Verne had it very nearly accurate in the 1800s.

Just as it's personal opinion as to whether you accept the existence of sub-atomic particles. After all, I can't see them.....

Concrete evidence is the type that sinks.....

 

Lol. Yes that's believable, that everyone in Australia believes in the moon landing. Dillusional much? Do you live near Melbourne? I'll organize for you meet with some people first hand that don't believe in the moon landing.

You are a big cry baby.

 

Only Americans are sufficiently disrespecting of their own nation to believe that they didn't achieve a moon landing. The rest of the world knows you did it.