Antiwoke

However at sub atmospheric pressures, the boiling point drops like a rock. We can do all we want to think we can affect climate change, but all in all, ain't nothing happening until China decides to make changes....like not building a new coal plant weekly to keep up with their electric demand for growth. We get far more CO2 from their runaway coal mine fires and Siberia's decaying tundra that we could ever hope to eliminate from all the cars and natural gas use in the US. Mother Earth says "ha, you think THAT'S bad...watch THIS...."

 

Then you'd have to define "who's reliable"? Some non-scientist with a smile and a journalism degree? That's on you if you think that's reliable. There's a good bit of disagreement among scientists over various things. Fact check this, more than half of peer reviewed published studies are not reproducible.

 

I've never heard any one claim "the current rise in climatic temperature is the same as past rises in temperature". That would be dumb, and how would we know? We do have data that shows temperature, in whatever way they've managed to measure it, is cyclical. Anyone who's lived several decades has probably noticed things change.

The Bud light fiasco is simply a marketing dept that doesn't know who their clients are. I never heard anyone attacking the ill chosen representative. Just the company for being so obtuse.

God, guns, and Trump? Don't get into marketing!
It's God, family, country. Anyone who can't get behind that has issues.

 

If I understand your implication, you think the journalists are misreporting what the scientists find. I find it hard to believe that's what's happening on any significant scale. Because I think the scientists would complain and expose it! You didn't answer the question. Where did you get your information that that's what's happening? The only alternative to Mainstream Media is alternative media like FOX and the New York Post, both owned by Murdoch. I'll take my chances with MSM. You still haven't answered my question. Where do YOU get your information?

Over various things, but not over human-induced climate change. Scientists are, of course, human. There are always folks with science degrees who are contrarians or have some religious, ideological or personal reasons for opposing consensus. Such idiosyncrasies aside, science remains the gold standard for acquiring valid, reliable information.

The so-called "replicability" crisis is concerning. Do you have a better alternative? Are you trying to use this to discredit all science, or just the science that disagrees with your convictions?

 

Global warming isn't just part of a natural cycle. Here's how we know that. Global warming isn't just a natural cycle » Yale Climate Connections

The Bud Light fiasco is an instance of Retrumplican cancel culture, like the assault on Target, the DeSantis war on Disney, CRT, and the war on Barbie.
Liberal 'cancel culture'? GOP bans anything it disagrees with
The Great Hypocrisy of Right-Wingers Claiming ‘Cancel Culture’
Look at everything the GOP wants to cancel | CNN
It succeeded as a result of a well-organized social media campaign. Celebrities like Kid Rock and ex-NFL player Trae Waynes "filmed themselves shooting up stacks of the beer. Not drinking Bud Light became, at least online, a litmus test of commitment to traditional values". The Bitter Truth About the Bud Light Boycott
Conservative boycotts against Target and Bud Light are working thanks to a 'perfect storm' of social media and culture wars, experts say

That's what it used to be, and what it should be. Meagain is telling it like it is, in the Brave New World of Retrumplica!

 

...