anon protest forum

Scientology lends its success to weak minds.

Why are people so weak minded? That is the important question.

Scientology is not the big issue here.

 

I voted no for the lulz. I´m with hippiehillbilly dandy on this. He is the kind of guy I´d like to have a beer with. I´d tell him stuff that I could get banned for but I guarantee you he´d do the same to me. Cheers buddy :cheers2:

 

Ban those fokin hackers on steroids.

 

WOW. :stunned: that was awesome.

 

been sober for 19 months now so ill have to pass on the beer but thanks for the kind words...

 

You're right. How dare they be vulnerable...
Not that you were necessarily blaming them exclusively, but it brings up an interesting point... I've seen a lot of people on here saying they have no sympathy for someone that gives themselves over so freely to a cult, but for those that are looking for answers, anything will do. Not everyone is strong, and as much as those people upset me, I don't think it's right to say the deserve everything they get. Perhaps they brought it on themselves, but I wouldn't say they deserve any treatment they get. That's a little too broad for me.
Or I may have misread you entirely and you were talking about what made them so vulnerable in the first place. Still, I believe something should be done in the way of protection.
But then, some people believe hardcore in natural selection.
Not after you, man. Just using your post as a launchpad. Thinking out loud, I guess.

 

Haha thats weird, who put a poll in my thread? I am guessing Skip. lol! I didnt notice.

 

yea, the skipper did

and i'm all about natural selection and getting rid of weak humans in one way or another...death or locking them up for their own safety would work well

 

FireflyInTheDark-
I am not Anon, I followed them here.

You are correct they prey on people when they are most vulnerable. That's what makes it so insidious. No one in their right mind would join Scientology. That's where Dianetics and the free stress tests come in. They are never told at this point that it is Scientology. Most people think that they are buying a self-help book & courses.

When I first saw the Tom Cruise video, I couldn't understand why people were so upset. What I have come to learn by following the Anonymous movement is that Scientology has their own terminology. Once you understand it, the video takes on a whole new meaning. They think that they are saving the planet by encouraging everyone to reach the highest levels of Scientology (cost est. $250,00 - $350,000). What they don't tell them is that very few get through all of the courses. And when they do, the end result is not what they were promised. This is the only faith that I have been able to uncover. They have to have blind faith that they're just one course away from a better life. They can not discuss the specifics of their journey (testimony in other religions) with anyone without jeopardizing their progress. They can not question anything that is not working for them. They have to keep taking the courses over and over until they "get" that particular step. Paying for them each time. Everyone has to buy their own books, tapes, dvds, etc.. There is no sharing allowed. And these are all tax deductible as religious donations.

It's complicated but they are basically taught that whatever bad happens in their life, they caused it by not applying the Scientology principals correctly. This includes but is not limited to, having a child die or be born handicapped, having to wear glasses, having diabetes, experiencing a flood/hurricane/tornado, whatever happens--it's your own fault.

This type of thinking does not happen overnight.
The sad part for me is that from my observations most "Public Scientologists" are really good people trying to do the right things and lead a good life. The blind faith that they have in not questioning their text and their path, does not allow them to see the flaws and corruption at the top.

 

That's awesome Skip.

Quick question, how do you know where the ascension is?

Uranus was in Pisces. Interesting.

EDIT: Why do Astrologists use the Julian Calendar and not the Georgian one? I know there is a historical answer to this, namely roman catholicism, but I noticed that it's counted to the one thousandth decimal, and I'm curious what this means and if it's just used for accuracy purposes.

Very awesome Skip. I never knew you were into Astrology.