Funny thing about that 'luck' you mention... I am where I am, not because of luck... but because a long time ago, I looked around and decided where I wanted to be. As a free thinking adult, I then made and followed a plan that led me to being here... just where I said I wanted to be. But hey... best of luck to you! lol
Anarchy will never work for reasons explained by this song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwuiHI0-z3c"]YouTube - Anarchy Burger - The Vandals
some individuals have the capacity to be fully autonomous. the only problem is all the small-minded fools who label autonomy as being anti-social, sociopathic, paranoid, or simply delusional, and thus physically restrict the freedom of these individuals (with things like straitjackets)
so true. It seems like anarchists are the little punk rockers with studs on their jackets and anarchy symbols drawn on their sneakers, wearing bandana's over their face.... so dumb... and I admit I was like that once, thankfully I grew out of it.
The problem that we have is trying to find a system that is free from subjugation. Pretty much all systems wind up with the people in a state of subserviency. Even if started on wholesome well thought out ideals.
Anarchy is about a lot more than a bunch of high school kids wearing black clothes. Hope you aren't too disappointed with your early conversion into the world of capitalism.
When the 10-20% who are problems have all been shot, the rest can get along just fine. This country ran just fine on 20%less people, only a decade ago. so what's the big loss if its population is reduced by 60 million assholes, hmm?
Eh.. no? I said that because with a large group of people, you'll need to have some form of government enforcement. With a small group of people, or even like the country town I live in, the need for government enforcement is not quite necessary because it's tiny, and the people can take care of themselves.
It is interesting that those who claim population reduction as beneficial, are not lining up to fulfill that statistic.
OK let us say, hypothetically that there are only 3 people in the world. A relatively moderate populus you may say.. And let's suppose that one of them decides to be a **** and spoil it for the other two. So one of the other two decides that in order to maintain stability he or she has to be a bigger ****, to the extent that the other two are not allowed to be cunts any more. The third person then says, fuck this this! I'm fed up with everyone listening to this ****. And so he tries to persuade the first **** that he or she shouldn't listen to the other ****. He or she then fails and decides to become a revolutionary, living the rest of his or her days alone and wallowing in his or her own anger at the world and his or hers impotence to do anything about the fact that everyone in the world is a **** apart from him or her. In what way is that any different to a hypothetical world containing 9 billion arseholes?