Americans, why do you let this continue?

You don't. My motive is obscure to you.

Better with?

You think better than me but I love you none the less for it.

 

So tell me straight. What is it?

Ok then, you're on. Without. I've never tickled a trout before, but why not.

Better blah. As for harder, who knows? Who cares if we love to see that we are thinking?

 

You don't. My motive is obscure to you.

Beginning with magnanimous intent to be I
articulate being.
You believe I deny life and love condition. You believe love and life to be synonymous. I know life conditional and love is what we are. Love is the call to life, condition is how or what we call it.

When you say you are better with does that mean worse without, is what I was wondering?
I am equal to my practice with.

Or better with?

I didn't mean to show you apathy. I think it has something to do with denial.

 

As much as I dislike saying so, it is probably a fact that if I wasn't so busy opposing you, I'd be applying for discipleship.

I've heard of stranger things . . .

 

Know thyself

 

If you mean in the "biblical sense," I've already accomplished that . . . many, many, etc. etc. times.

 

To thine own self be true, but keep all others guessing.

 

If we are true to ourselves there is no other.

 

Well then who's charging me for all the stuff I buy at the store? Cuz if that's me, I'm going to have a word with myself, and It's not going to be pleasant.

 

There is no charge for stuff you don't buy. Money is an agreement.

 

You know, we're more alike than you know. I, too, have considered that if I didn't buy the stuff, there would be no charge. I don't know about you, but I'm pretty sure I'd feel somewhat guilty for taking someone else's stuff. How do you deal with the guilt? And what if you get caught?!

 

Ohhhhhhh, I get it now. If we're all one, then everybody's stuff is everybody's stuff. This is good news because my next door neighbor's stuff is way better than mine.