Al Qaeda must be the stupidest terrorists, no wait, stupidest people period

Gee PB, still so cognitively dissonant you can't figure out what tactical transport-infrstructure orchestration could mean? How telling of your lack of any real intellect whatsoever. Though hardly surprising since you never present anything other than snide derision and mockery on these boards.

Lets break it down for you...

Tactical: hitting 5 stations, in the stations themselves as intended, depending upon 5 separate trains and routes all to converge within mere minutes of one another.

Transport-Infrastructure Orchestration: Like all major urabn transport schemes, just as with air traffic control, the lines/routes and the vehicles in question must be controlled and monitored at all times by a control centre. Insinuating one or more persons into such a facility to ensure the right trains were IN each station at the appointed times, especially where it has been admitted that a "exercise" of the very nature as that which actually occurred was being conducted at the same time, would not be all that difficult for our intelligence community to achieve. A far more plausible scenario of events given the clear beneficiaries of the furtherance of the bogus WoT, which have been pointed out repeatedly.

Of course, being the apologist for known war criminals and more so for the present corporate-criminalist system the sheepish public accepts as the status quo, we've come to expect nothing more from you than your patented drivel.

 

I know very well what tactical transport-infrstructure orchestration means. It means boarding a train, but since that makes it sounds too easy you tried to come up with the most ridiculously technical sounding label you could, as if that would make people numbly accept your theory that these had to be Mossad super commandos.

Practically every single aspect of yor post is wrong, and laughably so.

For the last time, you complete moron, there were only four bombs, OK? Not five, four. Four as in 4, got it? And only three (3) stations were hit, the fourth bomb was on a bus.

The bombs did not go off in the stations, they went off in the tunnels, and can you tell us how you know what was intended? No, you can't. So again, completely wrong.

They didn't converge at all. What the hell are you talking about. They diverged. The bombers started at King's Cross and headed out from there. All the trains that were hit pass through King's Cross. And as I explained (oh the futility), if everyone is supposed to set their watches and detonate at an agreed time, where they have to go makes no difference.

All of which makes your next statement merely stupidity stacked on top of bullshit.

This means nothing. Absolutely nothing at all.

So with resignation we await your response, where you will predictably give us a LOL and a *YAWN* and proceed to somehow conclude that by completely fucking up the facts you have once again proved yourself to be right.

Keep digging a hole for yourself Lick, remember you are never wrong and some day in a perfect world everyone who disagrees with you will have their children tortured.

 

Sorry Lick but in this I have to agree with Point

There were four bombs I believe two went off in the tunnel one in the station and one on a bus around the corner from where my daughter was at nursery.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4659957.stm

 

5 bombs were reported on the morning of the bombings and all were reported by the BBC as having gone off in 5 separate stations themselves with the exception of the Travistock Square bombing which was on the bus.

Given that PB has often attacked posters for statements linked to supposed "facts" reported by the media before those facts were changed and changed again, its unsurprising he should again forget the process of steady alteration of the groupthink story until it ultimately arrives just where I and others knew it would all along.... the ubiquitous boogeymen "Al Qaeda" and their absurd lack of ideological rational or benefit for carrying out such attacks.

You go right ahead and agree with the lad, Balbus, his snide retorts and general hatemongering have already shown us all the spiteful shallow person he truly is. Ooh and being friday night, his posts must indicate that he "has no life" lol.

Ah his hypocrisy is notorious!

 

Having a particular interest I was listening to things as they progressed that day from the power surges to the realisation of the bombings and actually at one time there was reports of seven explosions.

And seven was reported for a while then that went down to five then four as the reports came in and were verified.

 

Its been a week. A bit late to be making excuses for getting it wrong.

This is meaningless. What would have been more useful would be if you had explained why you find synchronising watches to be a feat of stunning coordination, why military explosives somehow indicate Mossad agents, why you thought the trains had converged when they didn't, why you though the bombs went off in the stations when they didn't, what basis you had for declaring the bomber's intentions, or any of the other errors in your post. I have a feeling you are abandoning all these arguments and moving on to pure ranting.

So we did get a lol after all. But at 7:30 I am still at work. Someone has to work hard to earn money and pay taxes to keep all the Eurocrat paper shufflers employed.

At 9:30, about the time you are settling in for a lonely night trolling hipforums and "lol" at you own jokes, I'm working on some tactical transport-infrastructure orchestration for a night out. Loser.

 

And the troll continues to show his aptitude for reinterpreting whatever anyone posts to fit his own snide denial ridden world of lockstep compliance with whatever the media feeds his tiny mind.

Nice additional, but as ever false, notions of what I do for a living and the extent of my social life.

A lamentable apologist for criminals and liars, is all you'll ever be.