9/11

Last picture is before collapse
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cfd_1200190365

 

Have you any pictures of the same or similar image with out the foam?

 

you dont like foam?

here a better one

 

No grass burned by jet fuel- Result:

 

That doesn't look like the Pentagon to me.
The same or similar image. I guess it is similar. It isn't quite the same is it?

 

The last 2 pics are from Shanksville, same problem of a too little hole and missing plane.

 

1 issue at a time.

 

Issue missing planes

btw on the picture of the Pentagon before collapse you can see clearly that there is no huge hole big enough for the plane.

 

here a video of pentagon before collapse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iD0qpbwHCYI"]YouTube - Pentagon Before Collapse And Witness

he says: "...small plane...very, very low..."

 

I don't think terrorists attacked the pentagon. From what I've seen I'd sooner suspect David Copperfield.

 

here a better view:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cfd_1200190365
http://www.rense.com/general70/3o.htm
http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies16.htm

 

I honestly only watched about half of this. Prepare to be bored to tears. It basically contests due to eyewitness account the actual flight path of the plane seen does not fly where the official story places it. I found it in a link that I posted in one of these threads.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o"]YouTube - NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT - SENSITIVE INFORMATION

 

^those guys have done a lot of good work exposing how ridiculous the pentagon story is, some of the best 9/11 journalism out there (even though I dont necessarily believe their idea that the plane flew over and it was bombs that went off). They've got a dozen or so films and some of my favorite work by them is when they destroy Loyd (the pentagon cab driver who supposedly was hit by a street lamp). They catch that fucker in his lies time and time again and people still quote the dude as proof that was the path the plane took even though the eyewitnesses they interviewed revealed this (blue line is official flight path and the yellow are the EXACT lines the eyewitnesses drew)

 

Well in Germany we are more worried about the latest horrors of police state these days
http://alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/LDE6901U3.htm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj7HByhSqJU"]YouTube - Stuttgart 21: Ungeheuerlich - Schlagstöcke gegen Kinder
cops beating up children...

back to topic- thanx for the film on the pentagon attack, I think after seing this there should be no more doubt.

after the latest terror warnings for europe
http://wsws.org/articles/2010/oct2010/terr-o05.shtml
why not have a new false flag in europe, after the Stuttgart uprise of the people that could be a solution for them to tighten up police state...

 

I've read some disturbing things about Germany's family court laws (speaking of a police state). Apparently the EU is getting on Germany because their laws regarding child custody blatantly favor mothers and this goes against the EU charter? Something like in order for the father to have any rights to the child, the mother must agree to it. Reprehensible, I think... hopefully that gets sorted.

Granted the US and UK are basically the same, it just requires some finagling and lawyering to get the same result.

This is way off topic. My apologies.

 

Probably a million people saw planes hit the WTC with there own eyes. Probably a billion on live TV. So.....

What purpose would bombs in the building serve? Would the US have not gone to war had the buildings not collapsed?

What purpose would attacking the pentagon with a missile serve? Would the US have not gone to war over the WTC alone?

These idea simply don't hold up to reason.

 

That's why I asked for a picture with out the foam obscuring the damage done.



While looking for your picture, I'm positive you have also seen this picture or pictures like it. But you probably chose the one of a few that totally obscures the cavenous oblong (not square) hole that is so blatant in my picture. Thank You for not claiming the exit hole was an enterance hole, though...I've had people, around here, try to convince me it was.

 

and you still dont like this one?

 

perhaps there was more to the agenda than war alone... perhaps the perpetrators wanted to collect on insurances for WTC1 and 2 and destroy evidence/documents etc held in the WTC7? these are ideas that have been suggested... a missile is very precise... it may be possible that they do hold up to reason after all?

 

I'm not even going to bother with that image.
When airplanes fall out of the sky like they do in cartoons, I might.