9/11

Ok sir, was just for a matter of size.
say- is it true that there are many police agents in this forum?

 

well considering the images we all saw on tv were cartoons...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXda5Kn2LAM"] SEPTEMBER CLUES A

 

This was an interesting video, thanks for sharing. But how did they have time to edit the video, I thought it was a live shot? When did they have the time to superimpose the airplane?

 

I know. But it does try and convince us that is how the impact happened.
The images I have seen point to your image being on a incline, and it was what stopped the plane from going any further. I can imagine an eight to ten feet deep and 30 to 50 feet wide hole being created by the nose of an aeroplane landing at 40 degrees.
I wasn't looking for an outline of a plane. This is real life.

There might be, who knows. The best people to ask are the moderators.
I doubt there is any in this particular forum.

 

its a whole movie you should really watch it all it goes into everything. But think of the yellow line first down marker in football, thats not really "there" but you do see it on live television anyways, same basic concept

 

That clip does look like an animation.
I guess it serves the makers of the youtube clips purpose.
But it isn't the only image of the impact captured that day.
If you are basing your opinion on the clip you posted, fair enough...but go check out the other clips of the impact as well, or atleast acknowledge they exist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtA6AlowhRk&feature=related"]YouTube - Rooftop view of plane going into second tower, explsion

I guess that's an animation too, right?

 

please I repeat it is a whole movie and there is a whole ommunity that constantly prooves tv fakery was used on 911. watch it with as open of a mind as you can and you may be surprised... maybe not but what do you have to loose, besides an hour and a half

 

as to the clip you posted why would this "amateur" camera man just suddenly zoom out as the plane goes behind the building? In itself not evidence of anything but a lucky shot, but the evidence only continues to mount, because any one who has studied the footage will tell you these "lucky pullbacks" were a hallmark of the day...

 

I've seen the clip you posted before.

 

each "part" focuses on a different aspect, I do not remember your particular clip, but that being said they do show dozens and dozens and dozens of others clips, the same woman evoking god in two different locations, the infamous bbc reporting of the wtc 7 fall 20 minutes early, the amateur shots, honestly I dont expect it to change your opinions but just as I watched the video "debunking september clues" in order to try to get the most complete picture of the events that happened that day, perhaps you should try to watch this one too. I dont consider examining any piece of evidence about 911 "a waste of my life" even when its obviously lies being told to my face, because imagine how much we have to loose if there not

 

I have no idea why the camera man chose to zoom back.
Perhaps to capture as much as possible.
Perhaps the camera could not zoom in any further (we are talking about tech' that is ten years old).
Who knows.
All I'm saying is there is plenty of footage out there of the impact, it can't all have been animation, can it?

 

I believe it was and will enjoy talking about this much more later tonight, but i have to go to work at the moment. Until then, if you actually care about what I have to say lol (I wouldnt blame you if you didnt i barely do at times) you should look up EMP/HERF technology and how it could have been applied on 9/11. Untill I'm back I'll leave it with this

 

I just noticed it does. It's been a while. I can't remember everything.

Have you read the reporters explanation?

I've watched/read both sides a few times.
I've not watched everything...
But at this point the views have to be of some journalistic integrity...
I'm not going to waste my time on something that claims footage was an animation...
Too many of these "investigations" are done by people that have no idea what they are talking about.

It's a shame TV didn't have HD in 2001.

 

I will. I'm glad you said "could".

 

Say you are really funny, odon- you write all the time that you are afraid of wasting your time but you have enough time to write 15000+ posts in a hippie forum

 

What did I say I wasn't going to waste my time doing? I was specific.

 

Judging by how the plane is rising as it approaches the building in the first frame it's trajectory seems fine.

 

planes dont exactly fly straight, they sway from side to side..

 

Especially when pilots who beforehand had only flown much smaller planes were behind the controls.

 

They also chopped out the zooming back. It kinda changed the perspective.