9/11 truth now!

Entertaining to michael phelps, all the same. He gets to do research, although in this case, looking for what you want to see is not very objective in regards to the whole picture. It doesn't matter if it is relevant, only if it is plausible enough to be entertaining.

 

You are seeing what you want to see in the information supplied to the public by armies of lawyers paid for with our tax dollars.

 

I see what I want to see when I open my eyes in the morning and see the sun.

 

lol

 

That's just fucking stupid, to be completely honest. Any good scientist (that is, some one trying to determine truth objectivley) knows that one doesn't look for imformation to support a hypothesis, one looks for imformation to test a hypothesis.

That is basically like saying you don't give a shit what the truth is and you will only take into account evidence that supports your view point.

P.S.
I haven't even been reading this thread, i was just bored and checked the last few pages but i had to comment.

 

I did go through a few.
I don't talk about thermite, though.

 

"Ho ho, very funny; Ha ha, it is to laugh.".... :smilielol5:

 

Doesn't it seem cartoonish to think the White House operates without legal advice from attorneys?

Please link me some government approved sites so I can read up. Seriously. I am not against viewing evidence that does not support my point of view.

Please view 3 minutes 20:00 to 23:00 from Alex Jones' Road to Tyranny, the news clips are the focus not AJ's toolbaggyness that even I find irritating. Stop immediately at 23 minutes if you don't want to hear his voice.

Murahh building content. Thermite is not mentioned.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6517776133137328105#

They are wrong too. There were 4 bombs not 3 if you count the truck bomb outside.

The point is we are dealing with people that change the truth to what they want.

My hypothesis for now is that no one is even watching any of these clips.

 

No kidding the white house operates with lawyers, the entire purpose of the executive branch is to enforce the laws of the United States.

And I'm not watching those clips because I've already read plenty, including a lot of what you've posted, and it's all asinine.

 

Posted: August 14, 1998
1:00 am Eastern

By Alan Keyes
© 2010 WorldNetDaily.com
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=18629

"The Founders added the 2nd Amendment so that when, after a long train of abuses, a government evinces a methodical design upon our natural rights, we will have the means to protect and recover our rights. That is why the right to keep and bear arms was included in the Bill of Rights."

I feel the idea of a country feeling the need to arm it's own citizens for protection against it's government is also asinine. But it seems the business of screwing people over has been around as long as time itself.

 

It's not asinine, it's realistic, especially at the time the constitution was written, the militia basically was the army. Not to mention many people consider it basic human right to have protection for ones self and guns have become the general mode of both attack and defense.

 

So humans have evolved so much that it is realistic for governments to have stopped unjustly exploiting their citizens? I sense the end of a debate. (not an argument)

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFgpXJb2I_s"]500 Internal Server Error

I can honestly say it is a fact that this is my best video for this thread.

 

Was there any point to posting that?

 

he aint mad at cha'..

 

Why would he think we would be?

 

It's an opportunity for everyone to agree on something anyway.

 

I hate that tune.
I wish you hadn't posted it.

Fail.

 

But my best. No?

Interesting that this is what you reply to though. Have you viewed the hole in the pentagon clip that has the book inside on the second floor? Where is all of our pertinent jet fuel now? Oh yeah, the plane must have powered through to the next rings.

 

No.

I looked at a few.
It was a little confusing as I didn't always know if you were talking about 9/11 or the first attack on the WTC.
I also kinda stopped paying attention when it appeared you were drip feeding us your well researched views rather than coming to this as an "amateur".
It felt that is how you first wanted people to see you...but then the pretense slowly ebbed away.
I felt I was being manipulated.
I hate that.
I could be wrong.