Would You Get An R.f.i.d. Chip?

And I'm not falling into line either. Both of you have been spitting out cliches like bullets of pure bullocks since this discussion began. I'm using basic high school info on how the body and immune systems work. I'm looking at the chip conspiracy from a historical perspective and o matter how many times it has been repeated with however many variations it has been bullocks. Since the chip and barcode variations it has essentially added up to technophobia.

Now I have a question for you:

Would you get a pacemaker?

C/S,
Rev J

 

Maybe. I would research it first

 

I'll just fill you in on this one.

Pretty much all of them with the exception of the one that Dick Cheney got have a wireless internet connection in them so adjustments can be made without cracking you open. The one they put in Cheney had this feature disabled so that he couldn't be assassinated by a hacker.

C/S,
Rev J

 

on an episode of "1,000 ways to die" some hacker moron hacked into his pace maker, but he fucked up somehow and his pacemaker started getting signals from the wireless game controller the kid in the next apt. was using.
his heart went crazy from all the random signals and he croaked...
or so they claim on the show.

 

All? now that I know, I would get one but disable that feature. I don't think the rfid chip would be used as much for tracking. More for personal identification and purchases and criminal record.

 

As Democrats for Life has pointed out numerous times in recent days, the number of local community health centers outnumber Planned Parenthood clinics ten to one. Rather than the one-size-fits-all franchise approach of Planned Parenthood, these community health centers nicely embody the principle of subsidiarity in responding to the diverse local needs of women — whether in the Bronx, rural Kansas, or southern California.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/42178/planned-parenthood-womens-health

A corporation's right to deny providing coverage for contraception is not the point at all here. The point is that, contrary to what you believed before entering this thread, microchip anti-pregnancy devices exist. I have shown you that there is already one on the market, and that there is one that will be available in 2018 which will last at least three times as long.

And I don't know what you're on about with your talk of a kill-switch. The only question I asked was whether or not forum members would be okay with their daughter having one installed. You've said that it would be her choice. I accept your reply.

 

It means exactly that? I thought it ment being aware of several sights/outlooks and being open to either of them. It does not mean with out any sight.

Sounds like a cool pop culture quote but nothing more. Even if the biggest countries and their governments would work towards it, it would still not be true. Unless our view does not extend beyond those big countries.

 

Damn that's a lot of chips

Current World Population
7,359,190,000

 

that's a lot of chips, but when you consider how many ICs the average person owns (inside of various electronic items) what difference does one more make per person. Small digital integrated circuits are so ubiquitous that even if there are people who do not interact with them daily, there's enough people with more than their share to easily bring up the average number of ICs per person close to one or exceed it. How many different remote controls do you have? Alarm clocks?


how many chips do YOU have around you?

 

I might consider wearing it around my neck or put it in a bracelet or something.
How is it really that different from owning a cell phone?

 

I don't believe in the concept of "Too Big To Fail" but I do believe in too big to succeed. Not only is it a lot of ICs to be out there it is a lot to find everyone and implant it. For every person involved in a scheme in order to make it work there are at least a hundred variables to go wrong. Multiply that by the number of people involved in the operation and you will see it fail. That is why I don't believe in the whole "They are going to chip everybody" thing.

C/S,
Rev J

 

Not that much different! The chip thing will most likely be something like a cell phone when we do get it. I don't think people will ever go for an implant but they might like a device that comes from the credit card company, or something like that.

 

as for cost ... these chips would probably only cost pennies a piece or even less if they're made in high volume which I assume they would be. of course the government would probably prefer to force citizens to pay for their own chips so they can make a hefty profit from it.

 

Again dude. Math, Science, Analytical and Critical thinking. How many people are going to chip? How many people are going to do the chipping? Who is going to do the double and triple check to make sure that something doesn't get missed? What about programming errors? What if the chip malfunctions?

If this is for population control as it has been suggested. What if the person chipped has been in a 100+ degree environment for too long and the bacterial weapon in it has died from over exposure? Or if they are in an environment that is too cold for too long and the bacterial weapon dies from too much cold?

Then lets go back to the basics "Who? What? When? Where? Why? How?" What are the holes and variables? And what are the consequences and new variables when things don't work?

Occums Razor! In a field of infinite possibilities the simplest is the most likely.

C/S,
Rev J

 

Lol what age you think we live in?

To give you a idea, remember when google earth was released? Well that was programmed to only give us so much.

Pretty cool I can look at someone's house, who knows what they can look at.

Now you think a temperature over 100F is going to effect the human body??

Man You in for a world of hurt if you were to accept reality.

This is on many many levels.

computer chip cant stand our body temp!

lol...

please..

 

You are stuck in the basics, that's your problem.

 

I imagine malfunctions and programming errors might be handled much the same as any other embedded device ... through a firmware upgrade via bootloader. However, I think some here are assuming way too much complexity in these "chips" ... such a thing if implemented would surely be orders of magnitude simpler than most common embedded devices, not to mention modern operating systems which are truly complex. I would also assume, that like most embedded hardware/software solutions that it would be thoroughly tested before deployment, although I imagine that in this case it may be subjected to more thorough testing than for instance the firmware in your microwave or digital thermostat; similar to other "critical" applications, or even the system of microcontrollers in a modern automobile which are by the way exposed to temperature extremes quite frequently.

RFID chips are mostly "dumb" devices anyway, they don't sit there and execute code all day, they mostly just sit around waiting to be scanned.

 

Take out the word mostly, and you'll be right. Without a scanner to power them, they can't do anything. What these other people are talking about is something other than RFID technology.

 

You were talking about using biological weapons in the form of an implanted chip for population control.

Are we talking about using a virus?

If so a virus cannot live too long without a host cell to implant it's DNA in and even at that viruses are delicate and sensitive to heat and cold.

Are you talking about about a bacterial infection?

If so you are also talking about an organism that on top of being sensitive to heat and cold (that is why we get a fever and the chills when we are sick. Because the bacterias and infections that make us sick can only survive in the 96 to 100 degree range so the immune system heats up and chills the body rapidly to kill whatever bacteria is in there). If you have a bacteria sample in a chip implanted in someone waiting to be triggered there is a very definite chance that they will get some other kind of infection and whatever the body is trying to kill will kill that bacteria also.

On top of that bacteria are micro organisms meaning that they also reproduce, respire, and evacuate toxic waste.

Let's put this into a human scale shall we:

Imagine you are put into an airtight room around 10 feet by 10 feet with no ventilation and 30 pregnant women that each were impregnated one day apart from each other in other words every day one of them will give birth. Now imagine there are no toilets in said room, there is no new air circulating. Now imagine that you are locked in there for 30 days with drastic changes in temperature. At the end of 30 days they open the door and there is a banquet table waiting for you on the outside. But there is a catch. In order to get to that table you have to break through 40 cops in full riot gear. Do you think you would survive?

That is pretty much the situation when you put a chip with a bacterial weapon in it and wait to use it put to a human scale.

Also the powers that be wouldn't do that for the simple reason that you don't want to kill the one who puts food on your plate. Killing off the ones who are buying your products is not a sound business strategy. Nor is killing off your cheap labor force. Also once viruses and sickness are unleashed into epidemic proportions it is impossible to control who does and doesn't get the disease. Look at the black plague that killed two thirds of Europe. It didn't just stick to the lower classes. Look at HIV it didn't just stick to gays, junkies and the promiscuous.

You are acting and reacting like a cult member when someone questions their cult leader with logic, science, and facts. To me the conspiracy theory movement is like a cult without a leader.

C/S,
Rev J