We're closer. You said not closer at all. It was a charged statement that simply is wrong. Just because we're not riding in them already doesn't mean there's no developments at all. There's an experiment with driverless cars (pendle bus system for the moment) near me at the moment. Far from perfect (first problem: it uses a public and much used bicycle path and its as broad as said path... so ) but hey, they're testing and developing.
Itd fascinating to me because i think we are in full bullshit mode, with driverless cars we have been for a decade already, with AI, for 30 years. There has been now what probably is trillions of dollars worlwide pumped into this, tens of thousands of experts, including thousands that could be described as the best in their fields. There have been many advances in technology. But no advances in logic in centuries. No new way to learn. Driveless cars, there are two main approaches, either pre program everything and rely on high def GPS or actually teach a computer how to learn. That first one, is anyone actually going to buy a car thats programed to sacrifice your family instead of wiping out a higher number of pedestrians, the second one may never be possible, building a computer that out of the box has already learned everything without any external input, someone would have to solve the p vs np problem for that, or if always required a certain amount of time to learn before being sold then may never be cost effective. I think at best you are going to see driverless cars like you do in Minority Report, where every vehicle has to be fully autonomous on assigned infrastructure for communter traffic and long haul freight. But then economic forces kick in, you have the haves and have nots, the inner suburbs of the wealthier cities have such systems....people mumbai are still climbing on to the roofs of 50 year old diesel buses to get to work. Then there are all the other economic influences, for the average commuter sitting in a autonomous car doing a sudoku puzzle is the same as sitting in a bus doing a sudoku puzzle. Why even bother with the up front cost of your own self driving car if the tech makes buses a whole lot cheaper, thus there are a whole lot more routes available. Or if the tech becomes that reliable, why even bother with cars or buses, just zoom from home to office in a chair like on the Jetsons.
This was something to do with you comparing prostitutes, whores and strippers to robots, wasn't it. I've only been with two hookers professionally and I didn't fuck either - one was a lovely woman whom I picked up at the bar of the George V, in Copenhagen, circa 1973-75. We ended up listening to Freddy Hubbard's ja (Sky Dive etc all night and drinking scotch. The second one was a tawdry trollop from perhaps Portuguese Goa, who was bought for me as a joke by a bunch of journalists in southern Portugal (we were there n a press junket). By the time we got to the two bit hotel down the street and she lay on the bed, pulled up her skirt showing her black panties (which just looked like bikini bottoms to me rather than smething massively erotic. I just put up my hands, palms outward and said muite obrigado and backed out - interestngly - we were al in a bar that served the classic yellow chartreuse which had been banned in Europe - but not because it drove toulouse lautrec mad Anyway - BOTTOM LINE I've known lots of hookers and strippers ad I've enjoyed their cmpany and conversation and the odd bit of titillation. They are not all smart and they have certainly made bad choices here and there but they almost uniformly have a dark story to tell. Robots can't match that. They don't resemble robots in any way shape or form - except to woman haters er . . . ? ? ? ? ? ?
No, you just think you "just married the hottest sexiest woman in the entire state of Texas" SHE'S REALLY A ROBOT
Not that I've seen a lot of sex dolls, but I think that's the best one I've ever seen. The only other ones I've seen are inflatables that look like the michelin man with raggedy ann hair
[SIZE=11pt]Many are designed with lonely, bereaved and socially outcast men in mind. [/SIZE] [SIZE=11pt]Supposedly they would provide an opportunity for men to practice social interaction and get better at human relationships [/SIZE] i.e. lose their virginity
I would totally buy one! I hope the cock is heated and the toungue can lick me at different speeds lol
She has blue pubes too. The male doll has multi-coloured sperm. Screw them both whilst playing "Rubber Soul"by the Beatles.
But what about the normal stuff, could you cope her ignoring you, when you ask her to pass your cigs? Or when you ask her was it good for her, and she still looks bored and pasty? Oh, and you got to do ALL the clean up
oh morrow...lmao! those are some good points (albeit funny though...) when it lights up a cigarette afterwards, then I'd be concerned though.
they'd probably sell ok if you advertised them in the back pages of porno magazenes. what i'd be more interested in would be to combine the arts of robotics and a.i., with the artistry of plushie crafters. imagine your i-pone or gameboy 3ds, following you around on four fuzzy sythetic furry legs and talking to you. they will tell each other stories in which furby was adam.
Considering, I'm ugly as fuck... therefore, I'm not ever going to be with someone... I would buy one. But, I wouldn't want to decide everything about them. I want them to be randomize. And I don't want them to just be for sex. I would like to date them and have a life with them, if possible,