Would a ban on all public religious representations and displays ease religious hatreds and violence

I am a Wandering Taoist, the Wu Li master of the Tao Te Ching, and all of our work is public domain. My words are mathematical and either speak for themselves, or someone else improves on them. Soon, computers will spit them all out in elaborate detail, and our words have a will and life of their own. The idea I have any control over them is laughable. They are my friends, my pets, and they teach me what the hell anything means.

The Wisdom of Collective Ignorance: Know.. | WritersCafe.org | The Online Writing Community

wuliheron > Writing | WritersCafe.org | The Online Writing Community

I want to sell my book for $3.00 when its finished, just for my personal interpretation of the poetry, but its all public domain and the idea I am some sort of guru or anything other than the idiot mother nature decided must write this insane book is laughable. I'm just the guy with the skills to write it, which required a lifetime to acquire and roughly 35 years to perfect. I'm good at assembling metaphors and analog logic faster than any human alive, but only because I'm brain damaged and worked hard to become the idiot I am.

The book is what the Chinese sometimes call the "Book that can never be Written" because parts of it are pornographic, and its humanly impossible to write all 4,430 poems, but Taoist monks routinely write versions of it as do many of my friends. I can skim dozens of pages of technical papers and point out where they make assumptions and logic errors without reading a word, because just the shapes of their paragraphs talk to me and tell me about the author even.

 

I don't like to read. It's stupid.

 

That's why I designed a cheap home made singularity. Think of a Star Trek holodeck that can take you anywhere you want to go, but you have to be careful what the fuck you wish for! Once you go there, there is no returning to the world as you know it, and mama nature owns your ass boy!

 

I presume you mean you bought Alexa and the Clapper for your lights.

 

No, I designed a distributed computer that leverages the most widely used VR headset in neurology today to eliminate traditional lag problems and enable me to use a simple adaptive AI approach. Its actually an approach that Microsoft investigated over ten years ago and dismissed as too complex with the mathematics, but the computers are about to spit them all out now, including Microsoft's own topological quantum computer. Next gen laptops should be able to run a simplified version using a thumb drive.

 

Wait until the theory of everything comes out. You'll know what it all is, too.

 

LOL, I have a thousand pages of evidence that the computers are about to spit the theory out, and nobody will be able to make heads or tails of what it means without my book. They are so far from figuring this one out, they might as well be on a different planet, not because they are stupid, but because civilization makes you stupid. If I don't provide some sort of insight, the lowbrow slapstick could go on forever, because academics have horribly stunted senses of humor.

Sadly, I'm not even really writing the book for them or for Babylonians, but they keep insisting on stealing my work, so I figured I would give them their money's worth. Like I said, you have to be careful what you wish for. My people have been doing this for 12,000 years, and you never want to try to teach us how to suck eggs when it comes to instant karma.

 

Google some of the computer generated music. It is basically garbage.

Computers following formulas may give a semblance of thought, but like computer generated music, the internal judgements we do of what we are thinking before we say it, is missing in the formulas.

If a computer is going to laugh, at something, with all the weird so called humor around that is not really funny, it will take many minds to perfect the program that can sort the good comedy from the bad. That or the computer might just die from not knowing how long to laugh.

Johnny 5 had to crave input and a desire to interact before becoming alive.

It will take a fleet of geniuses to write the specks and code for that program. That will be in the ----



Regards
DL

 

That does not equate to a sense of humor.

Regards
DL

 

That would be a long definition, but one of the main components is our sense of desire to become the fittest of our species.

We are born with that. What do you think we can give a computer to make it want to be better?

Regards
DL

 

Who named you so and in which tradition?

How did you activate your third or single eye?

Regards
DL

 

If that were so, your responsibility and commitments would shut you up. That or you are not a moral and responsible scientist.

Those who sign non-disclosure agreements are not nearly as loose lipped as you are.

Shall I tell you of the ones I signed for the Canadian Space agency?

If one needs to brag to make a point, it is likely because he does not have one.

Regards
DL

 

LOL, this generation of computers will be the first to approach the complexity of the human brain. As for my tradition, I've given it repeatedly, and have no need of any conventional knowledge of magic, when mother nature herself speaks plain English to me. She is the one with all the magic, and anyone who tells you otherwise is to be avoided. The newest computers have the complexity of the human brain, while in ten years they could be up to a million times more powerful.

 

LOL, my responsibility is to mother nature, while studies of people who call themselves moral show they tend to apply their morality to others, but not themselves, making calling someone "moral" a dubious compliment. I have no need to brag and nothing to gain, because all of my work is public domain and can be improved upon by anyone. In fact, over 12,000 years millions of people have contributed to the poetry I write and billions around the world today recognize immediately what poems are better.

Please, tell me some more about just what kind of asshole braggart I am who is so obviously out to fuck with people and spouts nonstop bullshit. I might be able to use some of the metaphors in my book. Tell me I'm not a real shaman, I could use the laugh. I intend to make a fortune selling my book for $3.oo a shot.

 

Religion is merely the opposition to atheism. Humanity has always strove to understand existence and our place within it. Consciousness separates the whole into parts to better understand itself. As all perceived dualities, this too seeks only harmonization. So long as disharmony is believed both will exist. To diminish one in favor of the other only prolongs the imbalance. Seek instead to accept the cries of both, for recognition, equally

 

Atheists make a lot of money claiming religion is just about money or religion is the opposite of atheism. Richard Dawkins even invented his own nonsense word "meme" convincing militant atheists everywhere to spout gibberish in the name of survival of the fittest. I'd say that qualifies as mystical mumbo jumbo. You could have atheist and religious lawyers argue over the definition and how much to charge people for saying anything different. I'd suggest copyrighting all your rhetoric first.

 

I've been involved with the Dutch Reformed Church, the uniting church and church of christ.
I don't go to church on a weekly basis any more.
I used to actually help out a lot with my local church of christ.

I'm somebody that will only go to church if there are weddings, christenings, funerals.

I believe that you just need to respect what is going on with religious beliefs rather than hate on them.

In australia we had issues with the vatican and people being sexually abused as kids.

If you are catholic this might make you upset that dodgey people were let in to catholic churches and schools just to prey on kids.

 

I was raised Catholic and find it rather disgusting the church still refuses to allow clergy to marry. But, I don't blame the church itself, which is merely providing what their congregations demand. Compared to Fundamentalist Christians in the US, the Catholics are all choir boys. The Fundamentalists have historical ties to the Mafia, slavery, KKK, and the Neo-Nazis and have the worst social record in the entire developed world, with the exception of homicide, because they prefer suicide. However, they do tend to kill their entire family in the process.

 

Western culture has been obsessed with the dualistic principle for at least 1,000 years. Humanity has been since the dawn of the desire to label suffering as evil and it's lack as good. The false ego must be fed, just as much as starved. Balance is maintained regardless.

 

Balance is meaningless outside of the context of harmony, while harmony neither acts nor reasons. Fuck all the justifications, fuck all the explanations, fuck their ideas about balance, for they neither have rhyme, reason, nor harmony. My words are based on the 12,000 Bagua and are mathematical, that's all the explanation I require.