Not much of an argument. I'm sure both get girls becuase they are famous with bucket loads of money, not becuase they are skinny. And both are uuuuuugly muthafarkers
If Mick Jagger and Steven Tyler weren't rich and famous, they would both be considered butt ugly by almost all women.
They should rename the horsehead nebula the Stephen Tyler nebula, always feel someone should be feeding him some carrots otherwise it's animal neglect . He is one ugly sonofabitch
Maybe at this age but not in their prime. Lots of women dig these type of guys. Same with for example Keith Richards. Maybe all in all the majority of women in the world would not find him hot but I bet there are enough to keep him busy Some guys just got it despite a lack of symmetry!
being famous does not count - i mean the regular 9-5 guy- if Keith richards or mick jagger were bagging groceries at the local food store women would be creeped out by them
For both men and women there is something beyond body type and looks that make them attractive. Intelligence, personality, charisma, sense of humor etc. Mick Jagger might not be the best looking guy on the planet. His singing voice isn't great either. But there is the x-factor of charisma. Paris Hilton is physically attractive. But is shallow, self centered, out of touch with reality and dumb as a box of rocks. I honestly believe you could shoot her in the head and it would make no difference. C/S, Rev J
Sure. Why not? I saw a lot of skinny guys but they were super tall. compared to me that is cause im a short shit. But its really preference.
"it" meaning a face that looks like a pillow that had been stepped on by a football team with cleats ?
Nah he needs long hair. you have long hair when riding horse because as it trots up and down it catches in the wind and there's really nothing like the feeling of the wind swooshing your mane about as it does the horse you're also riding. It's majestic.
I find that, pretty much solely because both my parents are obese, i can't find heavier people attractive. Especially guys! I've never had sex with a guy who was more than a little soft on the edges, and all my long term boyfriends were tall lanky types - every single one at least 6ft and thin built like a stick bug. Girls, though, i can enjoy a curvaceousness in that borders on roleypoley round. Also, ive been with thick girls plenty because they're usually the most experimental. However, a female with enough weight to be lumpy - for lack of a better term - are an absolute turn off
Love handles on a woman are simply very practical. I can't see anything wrong with them at all except when the possibility seems very likely its just the beginning