Will we impeach him this time?

Of course he'll be impeached, but members of the senate have already shown they will back him regardless of the constitution. The only way he MIGHT be thrown out , is if they would have a secret ballot. They fear the wrath of the orange yam.

 

It's those new light bulbs...

 

DOH!!!

 

after I saw on Dr Oz a little kid ….oz says "I bet you were scared that day ( of the shooting) the kid says " It was a drill" … Oz says "what?" the kid says " it was a drill"...Oz moves on quickly thru the audience. that made me curious. then on a news source, it was noted that there were no people killed that day.( on the FBI log). I believe ( with a lot of other people) that it was a an active shooter drill. the Manchurian Obama, within 24 hours, used this ""event"" to try again to do a gun grab. the 'rats will try anything to disarm the public. WATCH THE CLIP ( with an open mind)

 

It isnt a clip, someone said it was an hour long?
Can you post a link to the FBI report please

Also, sorry but the motivating factor behind it doesnt exist. The government doesnt want to take your guns. Obama didnt take your guns. No one has ever taken your guns. Guns are a huge money making industry in the US and money making industries own our government. After literally hundreds of mass shootings it's pretty safe to say the government isnt going to take your guns. Does it really make sense to you that the government is smart enough to stage all these mass shootings but not smart enough to pass a simple piece of gun control legislation?

 

FBI SAYS NO ONE KILLED AT SANDY HOOK - The Daily Sheeple

and here is the search page

You searched for sandy hook - The Daily Sheeple

now if you want the truth, you have to look for it

 

Psychologists employed by the govt can design your thoughts via the media . Have you any defense ?
But then being free from that influence you might feel too lonesome . Oh , well . Being free
in such ways I get a little trouble but not much .

 

funny , when you know the truth, the disbelievers will not listen. they always listen to government propaganda, they try to appeal to mothers worldwide, pulling their heartstrings... " those poor little souls" didnt happen. just a corrupt media complicit with the left

 

Ahem
From the FBI's site



Of course the Daily Sheeple is going to cut off that bottom part.

Took me 2 seconds to debunk that

The crime fell under the jurisdiction of the state police, not local which is why it wasnt included

 

think whatever the government wants you to think

 

now back to impeachment... the 'rats got nothing...like a paper bag full of air. on to the senate, what for the swat down

 

Lol...so you use the FBI as a source but when I point something out about that source all of a sudden your own source isnt valid anymore?

 

It’s not Trump they fear it is the voters in their districts and isn’t that exactly how things are supposed to work? What you’re implying is elections should only count if your candidate wins. There would 100% be a violent populist revolution if he is impeached which your side has no chance of combatting. I’d be careful what you wish for.

 

Looks like a threat to me...

 

@onceburned getting owned. Don't just take a guess buddy. Back it up with facts.

It's going to be interesting on what the outcome of this impeachment trial is going to be.

 

Notwithstanding how dumb this threat is, overthrowing elections is the exact reason Trumps actions are impeachable, using the power of your office as a political weapon is undemocratic.

 

We want the truth, you share an alternative one, we look at the supposed sources that back it up and they seem questionable.

Your summary of people who don't go along with your theory is off. We look at both your shared sources and the official ones, your shared sources appear not to be more convincing in content. I let the credibility of the sources out of it because obviously you would state the same about the official sources. But even without that the objective person simply cannot conclude your sources and what they convey are more likely.

 

^
I think the source was always considered by people who know the subject matter. It's just that the average person did not question the official source.
It's the exact content however that matters most and should be tried to get verified. It's here alone already that the official sources seem more likely than what Onceburned states and tries to back up with his shared sources (which btw is applauded )

I don't disagree with what you say about the republican party, Trump and Putin (although i think smear campaigns and other such malpractices didn't start with the one against Kerry, nor are they solely a custom of one political side), but it is just as easily stated about Democrat sources. All it takes is picking a side.