Will we impeach him this time?

@MeAgain you might understand that Schitt is a potential vexatious litigant.

 

What telepathic channel is it on?

 

abcnews

 

@************

This is what you might be interested in

 

I saw it earlier. It's a petty play overall.

 

They have him on bribery, witness tampering, and obstruction of justice.
At this point, not pursuing Articles of Impeachment would throw this country into a constitutional crisis and destroy the balance of power between the presidency and congress.
Hardly petty play.
3 legal experts made a strong and well defined argument for impeachment yesterday. And the one dissenting legal expert made a really weak argument for not impeaching.

 

No they don't. No point saying that until he's either perp walked or resigns. Otherwise it's just another weekly/monthly "bombshell".

 

They do not have him on any of these BS accusations. And I really don't think you all have any idea of the passion those of us who support Donald Trump and who fervently believe he saved this country (and I don't need to hear everyone's smart mouth comments....I know what you think...but at minimum 63 million of us think the complete opposite) have. And you talk about a constitutional crisis....just try removing him from power when his only "sin" was beating the heir apparent, Hillary Clinton.

 

lol

 

Some reports say this but i wouldn't believe them just yet.
The latest report was that the democrats were asked to draw up articles for the impeachment enquiry

 

By "have," I mean they have evidence of. And if they have evidence then they have a legal responsibility to pursue impeachment

 

Yikes


He tried to use taxpayer money to bribe a foreign official to investigate a political rrival. Not a bullshit accusation as multiple people have testified under oath about it.
He's used twitter to intimidate witnesses as they're testifying. Not a bullshit accusation as we've seen it happen in real time.
And most obviously, he has prevented members of his administration from complying with subpoenas which is blatant obstruction of justice. Not a bullshit accusation as we've also seen this happen in real time.
This is all pretty cut and dry.
I dont expect you to think about any of this rationally though, based on your post.
I am familiar with the passion of Trump supporters. It's a bit...disconcerting, is probably a good word. Unnerving, that 63 million people exist who blatantly choose to ignore the evidence and will support Trump no matter what evidence is presented.

 

What taxpayer money is that?

Remind me again what taxpayer money he gave

 

Foreign aid is taxpayer funded yo

 

Foreign aid, that sounds nice. You mean like money for blankets, bags of rice, canned peaches?

 

This from the lefty leaning Guardian newspaper in the UK, for a lefty perspective outside the US

Nancy Pelosi is bungling the impeachment inquiry into Trump | Moira Donegan

 

Oh you got me there. Since the money was just going to go towards canned peaches anyways it's totally cool that Trump used it in an attempt to enlist a foreign government to help with his campaign and investigate a political rival.

Da fuq

 

This article is just saying the scope of the impeachment investigation is too narrow and should be expanded because Trump has done more wrongdoings then what was included in the investigation

I agree and I'm really happy to hear you do too

 

Passion is what you have for a lover not for a political leader, it is the kind of thing you get in dictatorships, the love for Stalin Mao or Hitler they too were seen as 'the saviours' of their countries.

Remember the last line of 1984 when you know everything has been lost when Winston Smith declares his love for Big Brother

 

So you agree with this then?