An estimated one quarter to three quarters of all Twitter accounts are bots, and bots are more reliable for advertising to zombies. Facebook specializes in conservative zombies, who never want to hear other opinions. I'm working on bots that can ensure anyone on either website, gets every little tiny lie they demand.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand a word of that. All I know is that the TWITTER advertisement is on the homepage and Facebook's name is dirt on HipForums. I think they should be treated equally.
Facebook's name is dirt, up there with Fox News, which is building their own website, which this one will not advertise in either.
Twitter is home to countless bots, and my work includes making them cheap and all-but-impossible to detect, so you can use them on Fakebook, Reddit, or any website. The more profitable that Twitter becomes, the better it can provide the cash to develop bots. In other words, Fakebook is developing their own competition, that can drive them out of business.
As soon as we can get Skip to remove it the thing will be gone. We don't like either tweets or fakes.
True that. I was just pointing out that it's google who owns twitter....they'll still sell your soul to the highest bidder though, and hapilly share your data with any government in the world. Apple is a rotten apple
Facebook is just money, and the trick isn't so much to tear down the old, but build up the new, by making the old obsolete. Thankfully, the technology is about to improve by leaps and bounds, making business-as-usual flat-out-impossible.