Why I believe in a Higher Power.

Discussion in 'Philosophy and Religion' started by Spiritchalist, Jul 6, 2009.

  1. Stabby

    Stabby Member

    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yes logic is technically a matter of faith. I subscribe to it and so does she apparently. Her logical argument was faulty and I felt the need to expose it.


    I assume that by consciousness she meant "living and capable of thought". Because without thought there cannot be the will to "create".

    Of course that's a terrible argument because life capable of thought doesn't have to be created. Matter can just as easily become living with only the passive, unconscious assistance of energy as a creator can create it. There isn't sufficient evidence for either one. Although proponents of the former make a far more earnest attempt at proving their side, not enough to make me take a side, but their efforts are commendable.
     
  2. AvatarMN

    AvatarMN Member

    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    1
    No. But neither can you, so stop saying you can.

    And again; why doesn't the "fact" that the creator had to be created blow your theory apart?
     
  3. Stabby

    Stabby Member

    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    2
    The common rebuttal to that is that the creator has always existed. Of course if a creator can always have existed, so can matter.
     
  4. Tsurugi_Oni

    Tsurugi_Oni Member

    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    0
    Please point to me where I said I could.

    IMO the OP's arguement is really weak if he can't even give a good definition of what I've asked. Which I doubt he can.
     
  5. AvatarMN

    AvatarMN Member

    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    1
    Exactly; the statement "something conscious cannot create something unconscious" is unsustainable, because if you say there's a conscious creator... well... then he had to be created by something conscious. And so on, until you have to admit your theory is bunk.
     
  6. Skizm

    Skizm Member

    Messages:
    872
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nuh uh, God did it!

    I mean just look at this universe, it's too complex to "just exist." It had to be created by a God that "just exists."

    Dumb non-believer!
     
  7. Stabby

    Stabby Member

    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don't think that everything needs an origin. Something can't come from nothing. That's besides the point though.
     
  8. Skizm

    Skizm Member

    Messages:
    872
    Likes Received:
    0
    When looking at the question of creation, you run into many problems, and you need to define them before going any further.

    All we have right now are theories as to what actually happened.

    The most plausible answer is the big bang. Opponents of the big bang say that a creator either a) created everything or b) set in motions the events of the big bang (god farted imo).

    Now, for the idea of a creator, to me, is not plausible at all. First off, we have no evidence whatsoever to suggest the presence of a supernatural force. A 2000 year old book that is sketchier than a Detroit crackhead isn't evidence, sorry. Second, saying that the universe is to complex to "just exist" and that it had to be created by a god who "just exists" is not true. Stop being inconsistent. Third, saying that everything has a creator, so naturally everything needs a creator, proves that god created the universe is LOGICALLY FLAWED because then GOD NEEDS A CREATOR. That's called inconsistency and it really pisses rational people off.
     
  9. Stabby

    Stabby Member

    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    2
    My point was simply that if a creator can always have exist, that which the creator creates can as well.
     
  10. Skizm

    Skizm Member

    Messages:
    872
    Likes Received:
    0
    I noticed that after I posted. My bad.
     
  11. Stabby

    Stabby Member

    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    2
    Actually let me rephrase that. The creator doesn't have to have an origin, that's not the only option. The creator could have always existed, of course then that also means that that which the creator supposedly created could have.

    All in all we have absolutely no way of knowing the answer. Because of this, the belief in a creator is a completely arbitrary decision.
     
  12. neuroptican

    neuroptican ...hadouken!

    Messages:
    1,757
    Likes Received:
    1
    Because of this, I spend virtually zero time thinking about why and how the universe was created. We can't know, so why waste time? I prefer looking at our environment now, and how we interact with it. Like string theory fascinates me. Couldn't these strings be considered a higher power? Not in the traditional sense, but I would say yes.
     
  13. Stabby

    Stabby Member

    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    2
    This thread is discussing intelligent design. That's what a "higher power" means in this discussion.
     
  14. Spiritchalist

    Spiritchalist Member

    Messages:
    416
    Likes Received:
    0
    Time could too have been a creation of this 'creator', however, and therefore the creator did not always exist, it just exists, it only started always existing when it created time.
     
  15. Stabby

    Stabby Member

    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    2
    That's impossible. That which does not exist cannot create anything. It doesn't exist. Of course then the question arises, how can something not have an origin? Neither one is capable of being known.

    This is why there's no reason to believe anything about the origins of the universe.
     
  16. neuroptican

    neuroptican ...hadouken!

    Messages:
    1,757
    Likes Received:
    1
    Settle down there champ.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice