Why are we increasing our nuclear arsenal by 40%?

Cap on Trident nuclear warhead stockpile to rise by more than 40%

This has to be political. Johnson wants a bigger dick to swing, now that we're out of the EU. There's no military justification for it. If Johnson kicks off another arms race in doing this I certainly won't forgive him for it, nor will millions of others.

 

The idiot Johnson says that the reason for increasing nuclear capability is because there is a likelihood of either a chemical, Radiological or virological weapons by terrorist organisations.

He obviously doesn't appreciate that the very definition of a terrorist is that they cannot be easily identified and reside amongst the population. So this stupid bastard is prepared to kill countless thousands (millions ???) of innocent civilians in launching a counter-strike against a tiny minority of so-called terrorists.



Britain to expand nuclear warhead stockpile by over 40% as global threats rise

16 March 2021, 3:49 pm
LONDON (Reuters) - Britain will grow its nuclear warhead stockpile by more than 40% to ensure its security in a more risky global environment and as it faces new technological threats, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Tuesday.

The UK had previously been reducing its nuclear weapons stockpile, and in 2010, the government set a cap of 180 warheads for the mid-2020 period. Johnson scrapped the earlier limit and said the number would now rise to a maximum of 260.

In its security and defence review, Britain said it faced risks from nuclear-armed states, emerging nuclear states and state-sponsored nuclear terrorism, and its nuclear deterrent was needed to guarantee its security and that of its allies.

NEWS: the #IntegratedReview has just been published, setting out our vision for the UK’s role in world through to 2030.

Read the full review now:
➡️Global Britain in a Competitive Age: the Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy

— Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (@FCDOGovUK) March 16, 2021

"Some states are now significantly increasing and diversifying their nuclear arsenals," the government said. "The increase in global competition, challenges to the international order, and proliferation of potentially disruptive technologies all pose a threat to strategic stability."

The move was criticised by The Elders, a group of former global policymakers who campaign for peace.

"While the UK cites increased security threats as justification for this move, the appropriate response to these challenges should be to work multilaterally to strengthen international arms control agreements and to reduce - not increase - the number of nuclear weapons in existence," said Mary Robinson, chair of the group.

Questioned over the policy in parliament Johnson said Britain was still committed to global nuclear arms reduction.

Britain also said it planned to replace its current nuclear warhead with a new one which would be able to operate throughout the lifespan of four new submarines being built and due to enter service in the early 2030s.

It will work with the United States to ensure the new warhead remains Trident-compatible.

With its current submarines, Britain said it would stick to its existing policy of always having one submarine of its four nuclear deterrent submarines on continuous patrol.