Seems that Ferguson Mo., the site of unrest over the Michael Brown shooting is being visited by armed Oath Keepers in bulletproof vests. Where I am at you will be busted for wearing a bulletproof vest out in public. Seems the Southern Poverty Law Center is calling them bad people. Does anyone have Oath Keepers where they are at. Are any here on this site? Are Oath Keepers safe?
They are right wing extremists. If something happens here, they fully intend to take control and force their warped version of the law, constitution, and religious beliefs on the rest of us. ... Whole goddam country's gone to hell.
They believe in their own interpretation of the Constitution. Those in the military vow to disobey any orders that are contrary to their interpretation.
Oath Keepers are controlled opposition and a convenient way of identifying people who may be seen as a threat in a martial law situation since these organizations all keep membership lists, and the people at the top of these organizations are likely not what they appear to be to the people who join them. People who join the Oath Keepers may believe they're doing the right thing, but they're just marking themselves because they're among some of the first people the government will go after once the shit hits the fan, so to speak. Generally these are gullible people who think they're going to take arms against the government to defend their rights and the Constitution, which is foolish. At the same time, the Southern Poverty Law Center are a bunch of zio-nazis themselves, as their objective to wage war on free speech by labeling anyone who might have "anti--government" views "extremists" and potentially dangerous, But most of these anti-government groups on the SPLC watch list are having their strings pulled by the same government which runs the SPLC and wants to do away with free speech. Nothing is more dangerous than the government itself, and the SPLC is just another wing of the government despite appearing to be an independent group. But until people understand the dialectical nature of this system, what I am saying will sound crazy to those who are reading it. And that is fine, but it's what I know to be the truth having studied this stuff long enough. Supposedly one of the reasons the Oath Keepers are in Ferguson is to defend Infowars.com reporters, which I find to be hilarious.
Well it's nice to see everyone has their own opinions on shit in this country still, "good thing we still have a clear interpretation of the First ammendment" set up for the most part,,, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone Anyhow,,, for those who dont get what "their interpretation of the Constitution" is exactly, maybe a read of this article my Facebook Friend (Albeit an occasionally frustrated, quick to shout but not to act till provoked with due reason) shared in regards to "whatsup in the Ferg" Now you all are free to take whatever emotionally charged slant you want ojn "what Oathkeepers are about" but dont take baseless, hyped media claims that only try to shine a bad light on them for the simple sake they have a rather straightforward interpretation of the 2nd ammendment than perhaps that of some of the posters I've seen in here so far. Are there examples of assholes or "potential bad apples" lurking within their ranks? I'd imagine this potential exists within any cluster of Humanoids, but I'll tell you this, imho, from all I've seen since "aqquainting" with Robert Hase in October of 2012,,, He is a stand-up motherfucker that despite how much He may wish to bust your jaw for what you say would lay his life down to fight for your right to be able to say it... as are the majority of their crew that I've come to know "virtually", despite what some media sources so desperately wish we the people to belive. http://truthinmedia.com/oath-keepers-ferguson-sam-andrews/
