Which political system do you like best?

Discussion in 'Political Polls' started by SwastikaLady, Sep 3, 2011.

  1. Voyage

    Voyage Noam Sayin

    Messages:
    4,844
    Likes Received:
    8
    Libertarianism isn't an viable political system?
     
  2. uglypuppy

    uglypuppy Member

    Messages:
    194
    Likes Received:
    2
    This book I was just reading, Black Flame, argues that anarchism is an extremely libertarian form of socialism. Does that count?
     
  3. Voyage

    Voyage Noam Sayin

    Messages:
    4,844
    Likes Received:
    8
    Sure, I just don't think it's possible to have society with absolutely no gov't. Even the smallest non-industrialized tribes and villages have some form of organization.
     
  4. smokinIVXX

    smokinIVXX Banned

    Messages:
    369
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you are an American citizen, I question your Patriotism.
     
  5. DrSpaceman

    DrSpaceman Member

    Messages:
    307
    Likes Received:
    0
    This survey is flawed. Democracy is a political system, and the only rational choice. Socialism is an economic system, the only rational choice for economic democracy, and it's not even listed. Communism, which is also an economic system, is listed as if it were a political system. The Soviet Union had a hybrid communist/socialist economy under a totalitarian political system, but I didn't see totalitarianism as a choice, not that anyone rational would have picked it. Fascism is also totalitarian, but it's a specific kind based on a dictatorship of the military-industrial complex. A real hippie would know that. Just sayin'.
     
  6. FritzDaKatx2

    FritzDaKatx2 Vinegar Taster

    Messages:
    3,661
    Likes Received:
    1,017
    Eh, Totalitarianism wouldn't nessisarily be a bad thing provided the cheif potentate wasn't an evil bastard who really kept the needs of his subjects close to heart. Democracy leaves too much room for idiots messing things up by voting in nonsensical "feel good" legislature,,, America is a prime example of this.
     
  7. themnax

    themnax Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,694
    Likes Received:
    4,467
    it ought to be obvious that no ideology, even anarchism, can actually solve the problem.

    from that it ought to be obvious that there's no good reason for anyone to kill each other over them.

    i support complete ideological neutrality, instead of making excuses for not solving real problems in real ways that are considerate of everyone and everything.

    i would support a form of government in which there did not have to be political parties for people to have a voice in issues that interested them enough to understand, instead of having beauty contests, between candidates about whom we can almost never know enough that is pertinent.

    one in which it would cost nothing to run for office, and everyone who could vote, was automatically eligible to be elected.

    we do not live in a hierarchical universe, and the true value of anyone, is neither who nor what they are, NOR what they have, but how they act, and their imagination.
     
  8. jmb159

    jmb159 Banned

    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    kind of surprised socialism isn't on your list
     
  9. uglypuppy

    uglypuppy Member

    Messages:
    194
    Likes Received:
    2
    Like I said earlier in the thread, the last thing Hipforums needs is a case of the Trots.
     
  10. themnax

    themnax Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,694
    Likes Received:
    4,467
    the poll needs an option for complete ideological neutrality. that would be a closer fit for mine, then any of the options given.

    i neither support nor directly oppose any of them, but rather am against the dominance of aggressiveness, which every last one of them, just uses different words, to create a deceptive excuse for.

    i know anarchy COULD be an exception. but that depends on the intention. i've seen too many use that as still yet another excuse for the same thing.

    size of government really has nothing to do with it. and when economic interests usurp the roll of government, they defacto become the same thing and the same problem.

    i lean toward my own meaning of socialism because the existence of government needs some positive roll to keep it busy, instead of busy being destructive do to lack of one.

    i agree that a sufficiently self dicipled populace would have no intrinsic need for social organization, infrastructure does not exist without social organization in some form, and while some of us could maybe live with the complete absence of infrastructure in any form, most, including most who claim to, have no clear picture of what such a world would be like.

    not only would that mean no maintenance of paved roads, but no batteries for their game boy and no grid to charge them from.
     
  11. Cherea

    Cherea Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,114
    Likes Received:
    40
    I like Warrism. :D
     
  12. K.Efrain

    K.Efrain Guest

    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    it more or less says that when you sign up on this site, but some people seem to think that those rules dont apply when they enter this forum.Fuck them, what makes this forum special? Nothing. Fucking lock the whole thing.
     
  13. Dude111

    Dude111 An Awesome Dude HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    11,087
    Likes Received:
    1,382
    Why bother to start a thread asking others what they think IF YOU ARE TOO AFRAID TO SAY WHAT YOU DO :D

    I believe the first option on your poll is the best though....
     
  14. Individual

    Individual Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,313
    Likes Received:
    34
    Where's the 'Other' or 'None of the Above' option in this poll?
     
  15. Rutz

    Rutz The Farming Communist

    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    10
    Communism is the best way to go for everyone, the problem being that human nature prevents it from ever taking root. Communism requires people who WANT to be communist. Most people don't. A little greed creates a lot of problems.
     
  16. Individual

    Individual Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,313
    Likes Received:
    34
    Join a commune.
     
  17. Rutz

    Rutz The Farming Communist

    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    10
    Yeah, I've been in a few. Good advice.
     
  18. ☉rtus ♉

    ☉rtus ♉ Waffle

    Messages:
    2,977
    Likes Received:
    1
    For all you people wanting anarchy...

    Think about it, there would be no laws (laws have saved your ass many times i'm sure) there would be no building code, food code, health code, and regulations in general... which means, your house wouldn't exist, you would have little to no medical, and the little medical you do have would be shitty because there would be no governed schooling to teach doctors. And your food wouldn't meet the standards it does today. Every business, every store, every managed place you love... simply wouldn't exist. How would you get food? Water? A safe shelter? How are you supposed to walk down the street and feel safe? People will kill you simply for the shirt off your back in a world of anarchy.

    If you want to experience anarchism, move to a 3rd world country. Have fun...

    Don't get me wrong though, i used to be all for anarchism... until i started thinking logically. I do believe in freedom, and i do believe the government is shit and they strip away most of our freedom. I believe we should still have government, but they just need to back off a little...
     
  19. jaredfelix

    jaredfelix Namaste ॐ

    Messages:
    5,267
    Likes Received:
    27
    wtf GLOBALISM!!
    :D
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice