Lonely?Erm Why?Coming from someone with 32000 posts, many apparently with the sole purpose of causing racial offence. Tell us please, what are your opinions on the black or African American people here?
No opinion as a group. On an individual basis... Hotwater is a badass. Cherea isn't black enough to count. Dunno who else is black.
1.Is it?or are you telling a mistruth? 2.Thankyou.And doubtless you are aware of the laws and customs of your state, the USA, HF rules and International Conventions/ laws? 3.No it is not I'm afraid.Why don't you tell us.Who has supported or encouraged this? Or was it, they did the exact opposite? 4.So to answer, you wish to use a word but not define that word? Is there something you're afraid of here?
1.Answer my question.I didn't call you a "******". 2.Care to explain why you choose to act contrary to them? 3..Please answer the question. Have fellow members or the Webmaster/ owner of this site encouraged or dissuaded this use of words and manner of posting? 4.Nothing you're afraid of?Why don't you "treat" us to an exposition of your current views on black people as a group and as individuals. And the incitement of racial offence and hate? In particular with reference to the people who are clearly black here.
1) I am extremely offended by your question and choose not to answer it, such is my right under International Conventions/Laws. 2) No. 3) This is a Free Speech forum, saying "******" is a-ok as long as I don't use it as a personal attack. 4) Nothing. I do not have an established view of black people as a group, I refrain from such racist generalizations. I base my judgment of individuals based on their individual characteristics and not their skin colour. I do not incite racial offense or hate, the people who choose to get offended by my comments are the ones who incite the offense, and the ones who choose to reply with hateful words such as Jamaican Youth are the ones who incite the hate.
1.I'll ask you again.Why would you not wish to be a black man? Ofcourse, you may wish to remain silent.But that hardly indicates someone confident in a defence for his remarks does it? 2.You do not care to explain why you act contrary to laws, rules and conventions? Do you consider yourself above these rules and laws and treaties?or do you consider them to be a "load of rubbish". 3.It has been made clear by various people that your words have regularly been considered a personal attack.Jamaican Youth made that very clear again tonight. 4.So you consider racism to be a phenomenon that should not be tolerated? Yet you answer no , in pt 2. i conclude this the "fun" to which you refer. You state that you do not care if someone feels "racial offence". And you state that recipients of the word "******"incite race hate, and not you. Tell us please, how do you define "incitement of race hate"? If you perceive someone "hates" your manner of posting in race matters, why do you choose to persist?
1) I never indicated that I wouldn't want to be a black man. 2) I do not act contradictory to laws and rules, maybe certain convictions, yet those don't really exist on the internetz. 3) The fact that certain people consider them a personal attack doesn't mean that they are intended in that way. If I would have said "Poster X, you are a fucking ******!", then that would indeed be a personal attack and then I would be guilty of breaking forum guidelines. 4) No. Racism should be tolerated to the fullest extent, just like anything else. Speech should be free as long as people don't actually act upon their beliefs. It's one thing saying "I hate Jews", and another actually going out and killing Jews, if you see what I mean. I do not know how I would define "incitement of race hate" in a few words, but if I was saying "Hey there fellas, you know who I don't like... I don't like niggers... I don't like them for these reasons... you guys should really dislike niggers too, hey, you should hate them, hate them so much that you want to kill them!"... then I would probably be inciting race hate. I choose to persist because the fact that a certain individual has a problem with what I have to say has never and will never stop me from saying it. Plus, I do it, just like everything else in life, for the lulz.
1.You said exactly that. 2.You said one thing.Now you say the exact opposite. Why are you afraid to admit what you said earlier? You now wish to claim "not guilty"? And you claim laws "don't really exist" on the internet?But you aren't concerned that you break them? 3.Well when it happens regularly and they ask you to refrain, I think it becomes more than a "misunderstanding". Or do you still claim "******" cannot be used to cause offence? Its a clear intent to cause offence to that individual. I think many of us here would deduce you did wish to cause a personal insult to Jamaica.Would u like to reconfirm that now? Aren't you "acting on" your beliefs? So the "lulz" is to cause racial offence contrary to laws, treaties and forum rules?Or personal insult?Thankyou. Actually it seems lots of people have a problem with this. Why are you so keen to continue this line of posting if you accepted it caused personal offence and was contrary to laws? Has someone encouraged you to do so?If so, why don't you want to name them? Do you intend to make personal attacks against Jamaican or anyone from now on?
I know isn't it super-tough eh? I'd love to know which TV stations feel confident in using the word "******" all day...
1. You see, now you're the one who's associating the word "******" with black people. That makes you the racist. 2. I love to boogie. While you have bad reading comprehension skills. I never did say that laws don't exist on the internetz. 3. The fact that they ask me to refrain doesn't mean that I will refrain. If someone told you to shut up, would you? (hell, maybe you would). I wouldn't. I do not intend to cause offense to that individual. 99% of the time someone butts into my posts and claims to be offended while that post isn't at all directed at them. I did not wish to induce personal insult to Jamaica. He butted in the rather lulzy conversation I was having with that one guy. Jamaica wished to get offended. There's the difference. I'm not acting on my beliefs. I did not imply that the lulz was contrary to anything, while at the same time it could be contrary to everything... including space, time, and my mother's breasts. I do not know any laws, treaties, or forum rules that specifically say "no lulz here... lol" As I've said, it wasn't contrary to any laws. I'm keen on this line of posting because it amuses me. Has anyone encouraged me? Yes, many... millions! Seth Putnam is a fan, per example... so is Tom Araya. I have not made any personal attacks on this forum in a long time.