If you like. But you haven't flushed away your piss-weakness in saying the strong man must be bound. What a floater.
lol So you can secure "the kingdom of understanding"? How undetermined is he, currently, in your estimation?
Yes, that's what you wrote. So how must he be determined? Does he have to take out a mortgage? Perhaps renting is enough in your kingdom. :-D You don't have to pay the piper. You're bound to be your body. The only place it's not synonymous with yourself's your mind.
lol What about in particular? That you think it strength to consider oneself ones body somehow means you think this strong man doesn't want... himself?!
So you're then bound to propound this idea on his behalf? Is he only as strong as you want him to be? In answer to the question who you say he who finds himself at home. Your talk of making him feel so looks like importunate force. lol
I didn't say he found himself at home far from it that is why he doesn't know what he wants or where it is. He tries to find it out there. Strength is consistently strong.
What kind of conversations are we having..... about...gandsons.....? There are alot of pieces to the puzzle missing here....if we are to follow along to understand......
I know, you mean blood absolves the Sin-factor for deciding the negation for the strong intellect and strong verility. There are blood lineages and all that.
You said he finds himself to be his body. You said he was strong, and that strength is consistently what it is. You've said that he needs be determined ( in this? ) that you may understand. Doesn't add up. Your belief in disembodiment is unbecoming. lol
:-D I've gotten that thedope thinks he's found the strong man ( yet to be revealed! lol ) lacking in something. ( Coming soon! :-D ) That, or himself lacking as a strong man. Now that Anaximenes is bringing a sin-factor to the table, my desiring explanations may have to go on. lol
No, I said he calls his body home. I said the strong man must be bound. You asked me how strong is strong or how strong must he be bound. I said strength is consistently strength. Your references to my beliefs are not consistent with trying to solve a math problem