What's A Strong Man?

If we regard the agnostic judgement for the human being being a Thing; adequately there is accomplished fait complait the transcendental project of understanding the Man, the psychologically fit, politically capable of ruling the country individual. That is the most un-corrupt person to want as your leader. On the other hand we may want the judged person to Vote For to be through the purely atheistic judgement for the human being; that was the being is a medically improvable and maintained by the hospitals in the same country. Atheism thus makes a judgment on the value of the applied hospital care and medical insurance for family survival to be sure for ---ZZ--- America. The hospital is important and no doubt just as important as the context ordinary able-bodiedness of the Thing-Man (by Sartre in the meaning of uncreative but perhaps instead constructive-productive leader of the nation). The medical object should do so-well.

Is this transcendental of the human being to BE medical as opposed that other legal contraption. Similarly, are the majority of diseases in West Africa Platonic? I think there a strange element of Platonism in the recent Ebola virus transmission. But why all this evasion of the privacy issue into the purely delicate quest in the public realm. Politically that also means a lot.

So what is the strong man sought for leadership in these nations to be thought for: physical strength or mental courage? Who was the great agnostic to study such ethical considerations? :yikes:

 

the same thing as a strong woman. true strength is neither physical nor biased on gender.

as for understanding, that too, is something of a myth.

 

didn't get this post

 

a strong man is a man who is not afraid to cry.

(what is ego, but whining about not being the center of the universe?)

 

The strong man is the ego that calls the body it's home.

He is an idea of separation and must first be bound that we may secure the kingdom of understanding.

 

this is called linguistic masterbation.

 

his posts never make sense. I think its funny when people give him a serious reply as if they were actually able to make sense of that gibberish.

 

That would be masturbation.

 

It is not true that his posts do not make sense. He thinks of himself as an artist and it is not clarity he tries to impart but he wants to be discovered. Mixed in with the tortured syntax are references that are like hints to what he is trying to say. In this OP the references to Platonic, Sartre, and current geopolitical events in the form of ebola figure prominently set against the backdrop of large unspoken perennial philosophical questions. For me to even think about understanding him I have to do research. I think it is unduly puzzling but I have learned to communicate with him a little I think.

 

We? Why bound? What are you talking about?

 

The body is for us but we must learn to master it, to consider our urges in proportion to what we want to see. For instance anger can turn into murder, or lust to rape if you don't develop some impulse control. If you are into swing dancing you must learn the moves and then there is the ever significant potty training.

 

Oh, but they do. I've seen gibberish presented as art and made by hacks, and I've seen actual deep writing by a real thinker presented as art... so yes, all of his posts belong in the mind fuck section, because of the twists, turns, and loops they force you to take, but it is constructive to at least try for the sake of trying. That's part of what he's getting at.

In short: He is one truly fascinating little bugger

 

I dont buy it

 

So by bound you mean constipated? The body is us. Is there a strong man you have in mind that inspires this caution for the developmental in you? lol

Guess their best form's found together. Realize it when we do.

 

No I mean bound up the stairs because you want to not because you feel compelled. Pinch one off.

 

Out on a limb, something I found in circulation: The agnostic is the weak atheist. The one who, like the atheist, would find the bound man, the theist, unbound, that is to say - come into his own, but is not willing to 'admit' that he is bound. Knowledge is still an 'absolute' for the agnost.

 

So how is he an idea of separation? He sees his good as outside himself.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVdB-UKfxD4

 

Circulating right down the toilet.

 

The strong man? Which one? Who are you talking about?