I just disagree with such a superficial comment like the one I quoted. The person who posted that is pretty clueless. I'm not tellin' my numbers, this poll is for the ladies!
Whoa, I wasn't calling anyone a slut or implying any double standards. Simply just stating if someone had 100+ partners she's probably going to be harder to please in the bedroom but also a hell of a lot of fun to try (minus the threat of STIs).
Well, it's a generalizing statement. But the premise behind it is that the more status men have, the more women will make themselves sexually available to him. Though it's not a rigid absolute, given gender stratification in society --- I'd say the premise generally holds true.
i don't think this was the topic really. I think i just turns this guy on knowing the girl has been with lots of other guys.
i'm a guy, and i can't be 100%, but if i had to guess...between the men and women i've been with, i think i'm over 100
I have to wonder, mathematically and biologically.. Was it your generations constant fucking that bred the incurable STD's that keep my generation from fucking as much as we'd like to? If so.. FUCK YOU BUDDY, WAY TO RUIN SEX!!
Promiscuity cannot cause new viruses to simply pop into existance from nothing. We can only spread whatever is already out there to be spread. Herpes type 2 is closely related to herpes type 1 which causes cold sores, which has been around for centuries. HIV evolved in monkeys and abruptly transitioned to humans a few decades ago after a slight mutation. HPV is believed to be quite old, possibly the oldest of the three, but flew under the radar without being fully understood for a long time because its worst effects are generally seen many years after initial infection. Nice try at creating a scapegoat, but you got your facts wrong.
I thought it was a legitimate question to ask. I used to wonder about that until I read up on it a few years ago.
Extreme promiscuity probably did play a role in the rapid evolution of antibiotic-resistant strains of nonviral STDs, but those aren't incurable (yet). So yes, it is a question worth pondering.
Quality or quantity! Id be happy to never have sex again if its shite sex! Loving each other and really wanting that person inside you = 100 lovers!
Well maybe proud is the wrong word, happy fits better. Certainly neither of us regret the number of partners we've had. I've had slightly less than her but all the sex we've had with other people has always been with each other present.
There. I fixed that for ya... And for the record, yes, I am actually into triple digits in my early thirties, with no sign of stopping. But this poll is for the ladies!
i am so glad i can say that i am not included in this category. but, really it could mean you've only had sex 100 times which i am waayyyyyy past.
I think people that have had sex with that many people have to be some of the loneliest people on the planet. I don't see the point in having sex if you don't care about your partner...seems like a strange form of masturbation to me.