except thats not the situation at all... i don't see what the fuck i ever did to you dude. you always try to make me look like an idiot via internet and its kinda pathetic read the following posts and you'll see that you're the only one doing.. just do me a favor and fuck off, please.
He never once said it was the "deciding factor" or that he would break up with her if the relationship didn't move to the next level soon enough. He was just venting and you're calling him out on some bullshit and implying that he can't have legitimate feelings for a girl he's only dated for a month and because he's only 16. I fell in love with my current girlfriend in less than a month, and I'll be damned if you tell me that shit's not legitimate.
I don't understand how some people are trying to crucify you because you want to take your relationship to a physical level and you are frustrated by this "road block"... its a bunch of bullshit.. relationships should involve happiness.. sometimes a healthy sexual relation with a partner is what some people need to be happy in their relationship.. im not saying its what should be the foundation for the relationship.. but I don't think you are out of line by being a little frustrated by this... sexual + emotional pleasures = happy relationship...
Love is subjective, what we all felt for someone at 16 was in fact love. To those of us in our 20's, what we consider love and we assume is a mature understanding of it is still probably nothing compared to what old people who have lived happily married for 40 years with kids know of love. Love is entirely subjective. Also sex is generally an important part of any relationship, two people can love each other dearly but sexual dysfunctions and incompatibility in a relationship can often ruin it. Any of us would be annoyed after a month and a half of constant dry humping, let alone a 16 year full of hormones where exploring sexual activity is a new thing.
Definitely. I think it could also help his relationship thrive, because him and his girl can share their first sexual experiences with eachother, and learn together. That can be a very special thing, imo. Trying new things with someone you care about is awesome, especially when it's also new to them.
i have no doubt in my mind that i am going to lose it to her and i'm pretty sure she feels that same way.. this isn't ruining it, it's just simply a matter of waiting and i think when it actually does happen the anticipation is going to make it even better.
Do yourself a favor and don't post things you can't handle opinions on on the internet. I will not fuck off of the internet, no. I see where you're coming from, I was rather harsh about your rather foolish "help me get high off my parents household shit" topics... But that's clouding your view of my response here. I'm cynical, but I can't see that I said anything particularly hurtful or personal, I stand by my implicit advice. You should stand by the things you imply too, instead of coming back and saying "but I didn't SAY that" *edit* I think I was also harsh in your "how do I sell my brothers blow" thread.... and I stand by that too... but I don't think I'm being unfair in this thread, and if the shoe fits, wear it. If not, move on to the next post and try that on.
The contents of post #52 causes the contents of posts 53 and 54 to, ironically, look rather like hasty personal attacks on myself.
I trust that your willingness to favor members with your rather acerbic opinions indicates your willingness to accept that they will reciprocate.
Naturally. But they look rather silly accusing me of doing things I simply didn't. I rather carefully outlined the situation above, again, in post #52. I mean, I seem to see that I gave rather good advice, in all of this individuals threads. No one's reciprocating with advice, they also avoided quoting and answering my post directly above theirs, preferring instead to lob general assertions about my flaming intentions. I always quote and answer specifically, directly, and in detail, in contrast to their "reciprocation". Topnotch, for example, quoted the rather empty, considerably less relevant post UNDER my rather relevant post. *edit* though it appears that post number 53 was made in good intentions, as he had perhaps not had a chance to fully read my own post number 52. 54 is of a rather different nature, however.
Of course. Why would I respond to that post when you can't admit that you're wrong and when you insist that you know everything about the OP, when you obviously know nothing? I shouldn't respond to this one either, but you seem to not wanna let this shit die. None of us know anything, other that what he tells us, so when he says he feels a certain way, I think it would be smart for us to believe him instead of putting words in his mouth and/or implying that he didn't mean what he said.