What is your broad disposition to the difference between a moral Jihad which wishes straighten out the national consistency of resolve and whether it is democracy people really want as opposed to a class worthy perhaps more dictatorship, and a immoral jihad which uses WMD's and generally terrorizes the private ideals of citizens in the name of bad judgments of their in turn morals? Should such a value judgment be valuably applied in this age of non-ideology and governments without certainly good policy judgments? And should the religious value for the judgment be anything moral when it is combined with issues of Sharia Law? Sharia in some way was the answer to peace working.
That acronym one will be fun: Rollover this: [acronym='But don't tell my heart my achy breaky heart I just don't think he'd understand And if you tell my heart my achy breaky heart He might blow up and kill this man'](*)[/acronym]
More reply options -> third icon (special bb code) -> select acronym, then it explains what to do [acronym='High on a hill with a lonely goat herd']Lay oppa lay oppa lay hee hoo[/acronym]
He he he :devil: or: [acronym='OMG you are as dumb as shit']I totally agree with your post, your are a wonderful person and everybody likes you[/acronym]
