US Ready to Attack Syria!

WTF... Syria's "rebellion" will be used as the hook, even the mainstream news can tell you that, obviously you do not look into these issues, may I suggest checking out the links that midgardsun often posts?

So THREE rather obvious hooks are: 1) The "people" want "democracy" 2) Assad is a "violent dictator" and needs to be taken down before he starts wars. 3) The energy channels through Syria are doubt an issue and will be used in the propaganda machine if other "hooks" fail.

US on the border of Isreal is EXACTLY what Isreal wants, Isreal is nothing but a front for the west (mostly USA) and will occupy the territory that the US manages to take over/destabilise while probably not officially extending the borders of Isreal until they have executed the same old terrorist actions in the regions where their new colonists are.

You SERIOUSLY need to get up to date on your geo-politics! Seriously!

 

MustLive

Midgardsun? Is that like crom and cimmeria? Let him speak to me . i will answer
you however. obsequious worm
Oh. obviously i dont
You suggest that democracy is a hook.. i laugh out loud
Kim Jong il is 'Violent dictator'. yet no war with N Korea since 1953
What energy channel through syria.?
There are none worth mention.

Your blind conditioning that makes you say That israel is a front.., Is quite funny.
Israel would NEVER wish to occupy Syria.
Israel is a nation Born of horror and above the desire to control. It wishes simply for the other nations to fuck off and leave it alone.
In '56 '67 and '73 it showed us what that means. A few millions defeated the entire arab world that was bent on destroying it.
I am no more a 'jewish apologist' than is required of a man of god to know jesus was a jew. LOL

And my friend. My datum on geopolitics is so out of your league that if my league exploded. you would not hear the bang for three days

Nic
CEO 'Aspergers R Us'

 

OK then, mate. I'll go against everything I've learned on the subject and believe the rambly rambles of a rambler.

Are you SURE there's no energy channels through Syria? No gas and oil pipes running through there from the middle east to Europe? Just want to make sure you're sure, now. And maybe compare Syria to North Korea to see whether referencing North Korea as somehow an explaination to something is really relevant, I just can't see it, personally. Aren't South Korea still technically at war with North Korea? And who are some of South Korea's best friends and investors?

You so rambly!

 

Mid east and Europe are not Syria. There are many pipelines.
From the caspian fields>[grozny] And Baku in particular.
I'm not flaming you but if Israel wanted Syria. why did it not take it in '73 when it had crushed syrian army. ? The road to damascus [lol] was open.
It did nothing. Why?
And please stop the condescending attitude. And i wont call you Midgardsuns' lapdog..

All i ask is why you think US would want syria.. I wouldnt. And niether does israel. It offers NO benefits to an occupier.
Strategically.
I;d be far more interested in owning parts of the UAE on southern coast of persian gulf [leasing]

May Ahura mazda bless you.

Jo

 

towards a ww3 scenario- northern africa as a new war theatre
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25185

sorry @skip that i dont write longer texts but my english is so bad that it maks them unbelievabls with all the faultes...

 

The US think's it's the brains of the world, and the brains always think they have the right to rule the rest of the body. In this case, control the resources of the rest of the planet. However,

All the parts of the body were arguing which was the boss. The brain said-I think so I am the boss; the arms said-we hold food to eat so we're the boss, the legs said-we run from danger and so we're the boss; heart said-I emote and without me life is empty;the asshole shut up and soon the rest of the body got sick and died. The moral is that even an asshole can be the boss.

In this Earth nobody is true king, nobody is true moral right, any can end up being the most important player.

 

Midgard
An interesting article.. but 95% of it is borderline speculation.
The fact that it tells us what type of weapon would be used is a flagrant
'i'm in the know' SNAFU. The b61 is a dev of weapons made 20 years ago to detonate 200 meters below ground.. not 6.. a tank round can go 6 meters.. They were made to destroy soviet command bunkers in the 70's and 80's.
The soviets made theirs to take out Cheyenne Mnt
Just came on line my ass..lol

And as a note.. why would the US use such a weapon?
It would not.
I and the pentagon would rather drop an airmobile Brigade on Tarhunah than use a Nuke.
Its not as if the brigade could be overun.
Just 1[one] CVBG south of Italy could render Lybian Airforce and army to scrap

Wake up kiddies

 

You have shown yourself to be a two-legged sheep. You have shown yourself to have very little comprehension of the facts presented. You have shown yourself as a non-thinking rambler. You have shown that you cannot maintain a consistent argument and are prone to imagining what is being said by other users. Seriously, SERIOUSLY take a good fucking look at the world before you formulate any more opinions, for god's sake. And you need to improve your english and comprehension of english.

You're dreaming that you're awake.

 

Perhaps that post is of more use if you specify why and where he has shown all these things? Or did you found that out in that quote with just those 3 words

 

who is behind the protest movement?
http://seeker401.wordpress.com/2011...text-for-a-us-nato-humanitarian-intervention/

 

Thats it?

LOL.. I've heard better come backs from 7 year olds.

Lets start with facts.. WHAT facts were presented to justify an assuption that US would attack Syria?

Is the 6th fleet on level 2 standby in eastern Med?
Have the strike squadrons. F15e and warthog. been redeployed.
Have arm and mech units in Iraq been redeployed to Syrian border?

Facts.. not 'i know because i cant be wrong '
As you seem to function.

Are the technical terms i use.. such as thermonuclear deep penetrator weapon..
or maybe '200' meters? to complex?
These weapons have been in existence for decades..
6 meters is 18 feet. Even the german super heavy guns at sevastapol put shells 200 feet below ground.

200 meters from 100k feet is nothing to a 3 ton warhead

I suggest you read a book.. or maybe two, before talking about what 'could be'
?

 

What the hell are you even talking about?

 

Seems straight forward to me

Is the 6th fleet on level 2 standby in eastern Med?
Have the strike squadrons. F15e and warthog. been redeployed.
Have arm and mech units in Iraq been redeployed to Syrian border?

 

OMFG You just don't get it, do you? The attack will be made by US backed forces (namely NATO) under the guise of humanitarian aid. In some ways the attack is already underway using covert political/economic means.

I was going to go on but I really can't be bothered with you anymore, I doubt you could comprehend the situation, not with your current mindset.

 

Interesting concept.

I would guess that the ROI of a war of conquest to be spectacularly low, even negative.

 

For certain groups wars are extremely profitable, for most countries involved they are extremely costly. HMMMM Money being moved from countries (which are corporations anyway) to corporations, sounds good to me.

 

Must live

I think your going to have to face up to fact that you are ONLY person who does not understand the straight forward logic and reason i promote.

It not that i cant be understood..
I just cant be understood by you.
You have STILL not put forward one reason why America would even want Syria. I have spoken to several historians and also a guy from SSG . None can see any such indications or reason. Its like US will invade Peru?

Syrian has NO resources. And is as stubborn as a mule.. After decades of dictatorship it would be the worst place to invade

WHY? [ would US even think of going there?] answer.. it would not

 

Its hard to do this, but i will now start burning all my money. Atleast until it makes a difference. Small thing to do, but i dont believe in money anymore, and the time spending to try and hussle will give me great chances to educate the public.

 

Burn the money, and all it has created.