I don't need to address it. Obviously Congress disagreed ONE time with the UN- that doesn't say much when they jumped on Agenda 21, the NDAA, CISPA and, the patriot act (3 times) As I said, the people deserve leadership that follows the Constitution. That is clear, concise and there's a reason behind it. If my ideas are radical, than I guess our very founding was "radical"
Too many talking points and not enough things to do with his time . . . The problem with debating STPLSD is that he'll just jump around between Obama/UN/Constitution/random (usually fake) news/gun policy/god knows what/drug laws/tea party and any and every point of his that is absolutely blown out of the water, as they mostly all have been, is simply ignored and he moves round to the next topic, and refers to himself in third person, as though the fucking ghost of benjamin franklin himself was hovering over him giving him a high five for being the only true 'murican in the world who can see through the plot of the zionist-islamic global illuminati who control all parties and want to shoot grandmas, hold african girls over fires, provide universal healthcare, TAKE OUR GUNZ, make us eat soylent green, and burn every american flag in the world by rubbing it together quickly with the constitution. I don't even . . .
I can see that. Actually the art of debate, since the status-quo of the majority does not believe the things you're suggesting, you DO have to address it because the onus is on you to prove your point with facts. Your facts have been called into question, and your casual mention of other topics like fluoride in the water to dumb us down, seems to come from left field and also needs supports to prove itself as valid. Your links to youtube, have been of low credibility that seems like propaganda aimed to freak out certain voting demographics (like the christian voting block) with video quality out of decades past. --- Now I'll give you that I think GMO foods are concerning as we really don't know the health effects on humans. But to say it's linked to some kinda population reduction conspiracy theory is where you loose me.
Would a global government and a New World Order be a bad thing? http://www.hipforums.com/newforums/showthread.php?t=75062
To what scrutiny? My views and beliefs can help every individual in this country. It is our current government that doesn't stand to scrutiny. My views have never truly been questioned, but the perception of my views have.
It doesn't surprise me that congress voted against the UN once, nor does it quell my fears. The problem is not with "agreeing with everything the UN does," the problem is violating the Constitution and American Rule of law in the process. Well I disagree. The last thing I try to promote is fear. I think people like you believe different, cause you swallow the government whole and accept everything they do. Furthermore, appearently you think I'm just some conspiracy theorist. A rebel with no cause? Nothing could be further from the truth.
Brave Saif al-Islam Gaddafi Telling Hard Facts - YouTube Also read http://metaexistence.org/gaddafispeech.htm
Thanks to OP for offering up a good and revealing post. One observation ; seems like the postee from england is the worst global shill. Funny, his "country" seems to be the most threatened by complete sharia and islamification. Will loyal british subjects soon be purchasing hijabs and growing beards to "help" usher in sharia? NWO . UN , fellow travelers seem to be the best friends of islam.
That's strange, how does it seem to be like that to you? That the UN seems islam's best friend I mean.
I think the UN is Al Qaeda's best friend- true islamist and Christians need to keep praying for peace, the government is not a friend to peaceful people. (Sadly.)
you are not. wtf is up with everyone lately? *goes back to reading at page 3 or whatever* (I feel like shit myself)...
You're totally fine! I scared all the fascists and Stateists away by talking about non violence and voluntary cooperation :sunny: