US out of the UN

So you want me to pick apart the entire video and explain why I don't think it does?
Do you think RT doesn't tell you what you want to hear?

It's hard to tell through the misty picture (No, I didn't say rose-tinted).
I was only joking.
I'd say it was well over 10 years old.
Perhaps mid 90s. That's still nearly 20 years ago.
I've been trying to find out - the reason being it's supposed to be talking about the future.

I understand that. But the same logic seems to be used in a lot of the e.g's.
The people in the video are apposed to abortion/contraceptive education.
Lets let Jesus/God/the bible tell us what to do.
Biblical indoctrination.

Where in the article does it say fluoride is put into water to lower IQ's?

Can you pick out the words 'China' 'Naturally occurring'? ' fluoride concentrations in community water are usually no higher than 1 mg/L, even when fluoride is added to water supplies as a public health measure.' (some of the areas in the studies it is as high as 7mg/.)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491930/pdf/ehp.1104912.pdf

In your air? Really? Where are they doing that - in your state?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_engineering

A couple of words were altered. It's 99.9% the same as has been around - I've just found out - for nearly 90 years. Perhaps longer.

Then don't repeat yourself.

I like that caveat you add there.

 

That means in your opinion, right?

I've seen him shake hands with many foreign leaders.
Perhaps he changed his mind about them, and vice versa.
That's diplomacy for you.
You win some. You lose some.

Gosh, slightly changing something that was said - what ever next.
Yes, you are right. Ok, why should people move towards Jesus/God?
Why even mention religion?

 

Well no, but RT doesn't work for Jp morgan or Goldman Sachs like Fox, CNN, MSNBC etc.

That's not very long in relative terms. In the process of those 20 years, they pulled the Constitution out of the schools, and our freedoms away from us. In my moms day, the taught the Constitution in school; unfortunately, today, most people don't know the Constitution or that it was meant to be the Supreme Law of the Land.

So governmental indoctrination is any better? And anyway, I'm not even christian, so the whole argument is silly. At least the Ten Commandments try to teach morality, but since we're on the Subject

"Giving every man a vote has no more made men wise and free than Christianity has made them good. "-H.L. Mencken

Are you serious? It says a Havard study has proven that fluoride lowers the IQ, the rest is opinion. (If I posted someone saying they put it in our water, you would say it's too flimsy or someone's opinion.) The FDA isn't going to tell you GMOs cause cancer after 4 months, and Huffington Post isn't going to say it either. 2+2, my friend.

So you think we should just accept this one-size fits all government drug!? I'm really not surprised. It seems like your answer to everything is just to "have faith in government":

"Faith may be defined briefly as an illogical belief in the occurance of the impossible."-H.L. Mencken

No, all over the US. There was even independant studies on bodies of water who has had an abrupt spike in chemicals and metal particles, after the people of the town was concerned with jets "spraying something" over the town. (Allunimum particles etc.) Why are you sending me government websites? These sources are so incredibly not credible. Even though the govenment claims they haven't "started" putting aerisols in our air, doesn't mean it's true; The government lies to us constantly!

Yeah, the words that make it a felony to protest the government. Here, from the ACLU.org..

"H.R. 347, the "Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011," expanded the Secret Service's authority to regulate protests in and around areas where persons under Secret Service protection are located. It could be abused to interfere with lawful protest."

 

Who do they work for? The viewers? Their advertisers? The Russian government?

How was it taught? How long were the lessons? When was it 'pulled' from schools? Don't Fed' funded schools HAVE to teach children about the constitution for a week a year?

I'd rather children be taught about contraception, and women have the right to an abortion. Isn't teaching children about the constitution 'government indoctrination'?

Perhaps post links that are nor so far-right wing Christian orientated conspiracies...

Conclusions: The results support the possibility of an adverse effect of high fluoride exposure on children’s neurodevelopment.

Are there unaturally high levels of fluoride in your drinking water?

'It's the fluoride in our water to lower the IQ'

If it's an/your opinion - say it is your opinion. Not state there is fluoride in the water to lower the IQ.

Water can kill you if you drink too much. Maybe the recommendation to drink 2litres a day is sneaky population control.

What are you talking about? Are you talking about standard levels of fluoride in drinking water? If high levels of fluoride are slightly detrimental to children - then yes please.

Don't say 'our' then.

Wiki' is a government website now? *chuckle*

It provides quite a lot of useful information, that's why I posted it.

 

Fixed. George III was most definitely a king.

 

The UN?

 

Kind of a vague question.

 

STP, the thing you just simply do not seem to be able to grasp is just because a person does not agree with you does not mean;

1) That they were not listening.
2) That they do not understand the issue.
3) That they do not understand your position.
4) That they do not care about the issue.
5) That they automatically or intrinsically support the "other side".
6) That they fit into one of your political pigeonholes that you rely on to organize people and your interpersonal interactions with them.
7) That they are "blind sheep" just mindlessly supporting big government.


Please stop before you hurt yourself......or at least talk about some other fucking subject occasionally.
You know there is more to life than politics, don't you?

 

Isn't that what the thread topic was supposed to be about?

 

They still teach The Constitution in school, and I myself was in high school less than 7 years ago and still have my US history tests around. It's still taught that it's the Highest Law in the Land. The fact that you even are trying to claim it's not taught this way is part of the reason I've been so critical of your posts.
(Note: And like I said before if people don't seem to know their Constitution, among other academic subjects, it's probably more to do with a poor study ethic among students and poor teachers)



I'm with you on the GMO foods though, I don't trust those, but mainly because it's a HUGE unknown of what happens long term to consumers of it. But it's important to also note that the specific kind of what got genetically altered should be looked at too.

As for the fluoride topic, if you don't want to consume it get a water filter. I don't really believe in fluoride makes you stupid, gives you cavities, causes osteoporosis claims, especially when it's well acknowledged that we in the USA like to use our "freedom" to eat unhealthy things like a high fat and sugar diet which also causes increases in those same health conditions.

 

It is about the UN, I just sited Article 29 of their "Human rights," and how they could be used to violate ours here in America. (page 18)

 

Yes. He was drawing a parallel to events that led to the War of Independence to what he believes the UN is up to now. I don't personally agree with the comparison but I think his point was clear enough.

 

You gave more options than I could've thought of myself!? So what is it then, what's this huge thing you seem to think I'm missing?

Our country was founded on principle; I'm only trying to keep that alive and preserve the freedoms of this nation.

It's not politics I'm interested in. It's the preservation/protection of my nations principles; It is not this arbitrary Government, who robs us to effectively take our freedoms.

I know there's more to life than politics. I'm not worried about my life, but about freedom. If I fight or not, I'm still not free. But at least by fighting the status quo, I'm seeking a better life for our children and grandchildren. Government sympathizers typically don't think about every child, who is born into a 20,000$ debt, and immediate slavery to our government. That to me should not be tolerated in the so called "Land of the Free."

 

I think he means other things like: Baseball, basketball. Random thoughts.
Poems.
You know, other stuff.

99% of your posts revolve around a handful of topics.

 

Well, you must've gone to a upstanding school, cause I was never thought the Constitution where I went to school growing up.(TN and MI) But I'm positive they stopped teaching the Amendments cause I've asked kids if they know their Rights. I believe they don't want people to know their Rights. It would be devastating to the "War on Drugs"

Studies (not conducted by Monsanto) showed Large tumors in rat after only 4 months of exposure to it. (Documentary of a study https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeW5yUSqdhY)

On the last part, I don't disagree with you. However, this also add to my belief in the hypocrisy of government; The Government has to be everyone's mom, telling us what we can and cannot ingest. (drugs,) Meanwhile plenty of unhealthy foods and drugs hit the legal market, and the government turns a blind eye cause it's labeled 'not for consumption.' I don't think the problem is the people, but the government.

I think some people allow government to assume the place of God. "If we were doing things the governments way, everyone would be perfect." Sadly, it's not true. Government was created by our wickedness, to give money and power to a few elitist, time and time again, and is no different today. I believe it is the nature of Government...

"A Country cannot die, but by suicide."~Ralph Waldo Emerson~

 

WOW, I explicitly spelled it out and you STILL don't grasp it, amazing.
You are reading the same posts, aren't you?
I'm on Hip Forums, what forum are you on?

what you dont "get" is that often it's as simple as "I don't agree with you."

But you just do not seem to be able to accept that without throwing around what you consider to be insults by calling them what-ever-flavor-is-your enemy-that-day political affiliate.

Have you ever in any of your most outlandish dreams ever considered that you may not be as right as you believe?

Frankly your entire attitude towards this and those who do not agree with you is far more closed-minded, ill-informed, and basically fascist much much more so than the "enemies" you are warning against.

I would be very scared if you or someone that thought/acted as you do ever came into power.

But of course you are so ultimately right and any and all who do not agree 100% with your philosophies just aren't listening, so you are going to go right on screaming from your rickety soapbox hoping someone, anyone will come along and validate all these uncertainties in your head.


As Odon said, we all get it, we all understand, we simply just do not agree with you.




you do provide some good laughs though:2thumbsup:

 

Really? Those are all things you have assumed/accused and suggested throughout this and every thread you start. If people don't agree with you, you assume it's because of one the reasons I listed above.

 

Just do a little bit more research, imho.
Don't talk to children. Especially outside of their school.



http://www.tennessee.gov/education/ci/ss/

http://www.tennessee.gov/education/ci/ss/doc/SS_3407.pdf

 

Agreed. Personally I don't think anecdotes are a basis to make sweeping statements and claim them as fact.

You know growing up I remember being taught a bit of geography in school. Nevertheless later on I realized I didn't remember a lick of it and refreshed myself on the subject. Now it's fairly well known in the States that Americans are a bit rusty on geography and an embarrassing percentage of high school students couldn't point to the Pacific Ocean on a map; but that isn't the same as saying, "They pulled geography lessons out of US schools."

Hence the problem with anecdotal 'data'.

 

Very diplomatically put.