Yeah, like they are EVER going to get laid again.... I doubt them two would be able to score in a bdsm club now, after this.
Johnny Carson used to say that for every scandal there is always a 'smoking bimbo'. Oliver North and his secretary that supposedly smuggled out secret documents in her underpants Jim Bakker and his upset church secretary, Jessica Hahn. Jimmy Swaggert and the women he was seeing at Motel 6 (after he visited Motel 5, 4, 3, etc.) Bill Clinton and Monica Tiger Woods and the many woman he did Julian Assange and the condom failure incident. .
Smoking bimbos??? Wow man, do we ever have a different opinion on what smoking means... To me... http://www.publispain.com/caricaturas/famosos/imagenes/monica_lewinski_tomrichmond_com.jpg this isn't it... lol
there are much better pictures of her out there http://www.fullissue.com/index.php/monica-lewinsky-biography-1973.html but lets stay on topic
I merely ask him to be as open and open to constant questioning as he thinks others should be. Walking away from interviews, like he does, just makes him seem a little weak. He should have a candid interview with a journalist he trusts...and get all of this out of the way, once and for all. Is that too much to ask? If he has already, his constant slightly childish behaviour is what is coming across to most people, imho. Seriously? Are you being serious? Point me to a thread or threads about some of the allegations contained in the leaks. That is not true. I agree with a lot of what "you" post. I might not like the way it is being articulated, but I can still agree in principle. I think I make Obama human. I don't disagree with a lot of what he has promised. I'm just not an unquestioning cheerleader for him. Whoops, sorry. Lol. If this is the way I come across. I need to change. A change you can believe in. I think I post a varied amount of opinions and crap to justify me wishing to post here regardless of politics.
Although none of the interviews show it, from the way he acts, and the things he says, one of the conditions of the interviews is that they don't talk about rumors. People such as yourself, love picking up on rumor and touting it as if it's some sort of incontrovertible fact without a single regard to truth or honesty. Here are some FACTS that you seem to be blindly ignoring in all of this... He hasn't been charged with a crime. He hasn't been arrested on a crime. He hasn't been tried in a court. He hasn't been convicted in a court. There are women who have made accusations against him, that under scrutiny, seem to be falling apart... That's it... How would you like it if some woman started making accusations against you that weren't true? How would you fee about it, if everytime a reporter told you they wouldn't ask about rumors, they did so anyway. How would you feel, if after making that a condition, and having the reporter violate it, when you tell them that if they keep asking you will walk... and they keep asking?
If it is a condition of the interview, fair enough. If reporters violate that condition then it is fair for him to walk away. But you acknowledge all interviews are not like that. Like I said, if he gets a journalist he trusts to have an open and frank (candid) interview about all of the allegations, that would be fair. I want the accusations to be addressed by him not his lawyers and PR team. I don't. I love truth and honesty. I seem to remember you asking me a question and me trying to answer it. I have not said I believe any of these allegations.
Here's an interesting view from within the US Government about Julian Assange: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaAUmPNR69w"]YouTube - Ron Paul on Julian Assange This is why I don't play party politics. Here is a Republican standing up and telling the truth. Stay Brown, Rev J
I do think he is an almighty cock. But thet is just a personal opinion about him as a human being. We all have opinions about people. You and Skip have thoughts about me as a human being why should I not have thoughts about him?
You want him to address rumors more then he has? He has said they weren't true... What more does he need to say about it? You bitch about the interviews... do you LISTEN to the questions? They are accusations... they are not questions... Also, IF this ever does go to court, besides the kangaroo, anything he says about the case on TV could jeopardize his case... AS IN ALL LEGAL SITUATIONS.... You claim this, but it is as valid as the rumors you have been repeating and pushing. If you love truth and honesty, why not stop spreading rumor and bullshit?
When there is pending legal action concerning the alleged incident then he would be doing so at his own peril I think.
Odon, I truly hope that one day you get dragged through this shit due to rumors by some chick you've pissed off... You obviously can't grasp what is going on. It's either that, or you are just purposely expressing anything that you think will go against the grain, as Skip suggested... As for it being 100% important to you that other people like what you say... I'm not surprised by the fact itself... I am surprised at your willingness to admit it. Here's a clue... peoples opinions of what you say, only matter when what you say is bullshit.
Skip is not being fair. It's what I think. Take it or leave it. Why have you turned off the ability to give you green balls? You don't care? What? Skip was suggesting it was me against "you" this is not true. Pardon?
And you think you are being fair to Julian? Don't be a whiny hypocrite. I want people to look at each post I make and decide from what is in it, what value it has... I don't feel the need to show off (or brag) about how many people agree with me. Of course, that would be related to the fact that I try to post my opinions and the things that I believe, as opposed to regurgitating rumors. edited to add; When you are bullshitting and spewing crap, peoples' opinion about what you say is very important, as you need to evaluate their responses in order to better adjust your bullshit in order to gain more acceptance to it. When you speak the truth, it doesn't matter what people's opinions of it are.
When has who said this? The comment was a general opinion about why he might not address the accusations seeing as anything he might say in an interview might be used against him in court... I do not recall intending to insinuate that he said anything so I don't exactly grasp what it is you are asking.