Uncircumcised or Circumcised?

tomorrow morning? ybh, i'll whip it out in your direction any time you want!

 

IN THE LATE 1800 "victorian days" as a cure for masturbation and other quakery .

 

wrong puritans did not circumcise.

 

From the Oakland Tribune:

Setting aside the religious rituals practiced by Jews and Muslims, we
understand better the phenomenon of "medical" circumcision. Originally
advocated by British doctors, under the reign of the Puritan Queen Victoria
(to prevent, medically, the harmful effects of...childhood masturbation!),
this practice proceeded to spread to all of the Anglo-Saxon world, including
the United States. The majority of European countries, however, refused to
follow in the footsteps of the British, as, for that matter, 80% of the
world's countries, which don't practice circumcision except in cases of
absolute necessity.





My original statement:

Ok, I got a few of the specifics wrong.....
But it originated by a Puritan Queen, spread to the Puritans in the Americas and it was for the purpose of taking pleasure away from things sexual.....
Therefore I stand by my original post

 

circumcision was never popular in england specially before 1945 it was only after ww 2 some of them were done "influence by the money the U.S doctors were making" today is not popular at all after the truth came out in early 1990s.

 

I don't really care how the fuck it started....all I know is that cutting up an already perfectly made body organ is just WRONG.

 

I don't care if it's circumcised or not, it works both ways. I'm cut, so that might affect my opinion on it.

 

Oh ITA with you ~ I guess I look at it as a mother of a son as well. So its not just about sex when I think about it. There is no way I would let anyone cut up my perfect baby boy...you know what I mean?
Now from a sexual point of view I think its a treat to have an uncut guy, but a cut guy isn't disappointing by any means.

 

i am au natural

 

I just like cock. I really don't understand the point of this thread. Circumcising your member is quite similar to putting plugs in your ears, or plucking your eyebrows if you want to argue the semantics of body modification. Talk amongst yourselves.

 

the question is was it your choice ?.

 

we dont care what you like.

 

Apparently circumcision reduces the chance of penile cancer IF done in the first 6 months of life....very fishy....I'm not so sure if I believe that.

In terms of pure asthetics, I prefer circumsized males. Sometimes, though, I wonder if uncircumcised ones last longer.

 

With a scalpel ?

 

I know exactly what you are saying. It really does look majestic and proud when fully frown. It is a part of the whole attraction. Men on the other hand get high on looking at the wet vagina. It is a matter of sexual attraction, and cercumcision adds to it.

 

tbh, being cut wouldn't be so bad, as most hollywood and/or porn penises are cut and thats what people expect to see. kind of :/

anyway, one thing I can say cut is better for, less pleasure for you in one go, and more for your lady. That sounds a bargain for me.

 

One thing this topic has proven: the unbelieveable amount of ignorance about the practice of removing skin from a living human being without his permission.About 5 sq. inches is the estimated final (grown up) amount missing. Especially among women, who seem to be the approving authority in the US. If fathers were given the choice of approving female circumcision would they approve the operation in such vast numbers? BTW, ref the last four posts: the lady get less chaffe from natural penises, the man gets far more feeling, and I question the worth of aesthetic judgements of women about men's physical conditions. If you are looking at flacid penises, Ms., then maybe you should get a new man. Erect we all look the same - and I would think that's the state you'd want us.

 

I like my foreskin; it's my friend. (not really). However, today I caught it in my belt buckle. I don't recommend trying it coz it hurt like hell.

 

Taa-da, a female who understands why men are so sensitive about how their peni look. It's just that feeling I get about my boobs and I feel bad for men. To be honest I think all cocks are beautiful, whether they are small or big, whether they are circumcized or not. There is nothing for a man to be ashamed of in my honest opinion. I believed removing it was just for sanity reasons, but since I've read through every single post here, I've changed my mind. Men, if you are circumsized and you love it, then good for you, love your cock ;D I sure do. But make a wise decision when it comes to having children, maybe let your own child have a choice in the matter before you make it for him. Maybe he will some day feel diffrently than you. And if you're cut and embarressed about it, feel no shame, it looks absolutely fabulous! And if you're a man with it un-cut, then congrats, but don't make others feel bad for what they have. You're dick is absoltely great, they all are and I'd like to give a round of applause for all these guys out there who aren't ashamed with what they have.

Just like myself, I have to love what I have, it's natural, it's beautiful and I just love it.

 

after reading all this, i am quite glad i am 100% all natural. i always thought more people were circumcized and someone told me its bigger if its circumcized. im glad its not true