Trump's been re-elected - now what?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by newo, Nov 7, 2024.

  1. newo

    newo Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    11,962
    Likes Received:
    12,322
  2. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    14,440
    I was watching President Bill Clinton on Colbert yesterday and the interview clearly highlighted why the Democrats lost.

    Clinton was very soft spoken and articulate. He was rational and hopeful.
    He explained how much the Democrats have helped the nation and what good condition the economy is in, etc.

    But you had to actively listen to him.
    He didn't rant and rave, didn't attack others or make fun of them, didn't promote violence, didn't promote conspiracy theories, and didn't blame others for supposed wrongs.

    That isn't want the public wants, they want WWE table smashing, foaming at the mouth entertainment.
    And that's what Trump gave them.

    upload_2024-11-21_8-25-36.jpeg
     
  3. TrudginAcrossTheTundra

    TrudginAcrossTheTundra Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    3,894
    Likes Received:
    2,165
    That's exactly why things went the way they did! And yes, it is a revolution of sorts. Let's pray the new team can overcome the machine.
     
  4. TrudginAcrossTheTundra

    TrudginAcrossTheTundra Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    3,894
    Likes Received:
    2,165
    Bill is an old school Democrat, the good kind. The kind Trump was at the time, Elon was, RFKjr was, Tulsi was... That party got largely taken over by power hungry elitist kooks. They all say they didn't leave the Democrat party, the party left them. The democrat party machine has been attacking others, blaming them, and promoting conspiracy theories. They strive to dictate how to live every aspect of our lives. And not allow dissenting views. They claim the opposition is trying to "steal democracy" while they're stealing our freedoms. Enough people saw through it and expect better.
     
  5. TrudginAcrossTheTundra

    TrudginAcrossTheTundra Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    3,894
    Likes Received:
    2,165
    In what way is that 'disturbing' to you?
     
  6. newo

    newo Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    11,962
    Likes Received:
    12,322
    Now he intends to nominate the WWE's Linda McMahon as Secretary of Education and Dr. Mehmet Oz to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

    McMahon has little background in education, but did serve on Connecticut state's board of education from 2009 until 2010. She is the board chair of the pro-Trump think tank the America First Policy Institute, meaning her confirmation in the Republican-majority Senate is likely.

    [​IMG]

    Dr. Oz has been criticized by experts for promoting what they called bad health advice about weight loss drugs and "miracle" cures, and suggesting malaria drugs as a cure for Covid-19 in the early days of the pandemic. Such drugs proved to be ineffective.

    [​IMG]

    So who's next? It seems if you're loyal to Trump and have made a name for yourself you have a good shot at a cabinet pick. Who needs qualifications?
    .
    .
     
  7. goatrope

    goatrope Members

    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    118
    The fact that Linda McMahon "was interested in teaching" as a young woman ISN'T enough qualifications to be the Secretary of Education? Then,
    what is? (Plus, all she needs to do is fire everyone other than herself).
     
  8. newo

    newo Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    11,962
    Likes Received:
    12,322
  9. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    14,440
    You are very confused. You are describing the Republicans.
    The Democrats aren't supported by the richest power hungry man in the world.

    The Republicans are the ones attacking gays, immigrants, women (several sexually), scientists, doctors, the media, TV personalities, the handicap, etc...not the Democrats.

    Conspiracy theories?
    LOL!
    Let's see, Hillary eats babies, public school teachers are performing sex change operations, Obama is a Muslim, the Italians interfered in our election, space lasers started the California fires, the Clintons murdered 50 people, Harris isn't a U.S. citizen, Joe Scarborough killed someone, the election was stolen, vaccines cause autism, wind turbines cause cancer, the Sandy Hook shootings were a hoax, on and on and on.

    The Dems dictate how to lead our lives? How? By telling people what they can and can't do with their body based on religious views? Not allowing local school boards to decide curriculum? Restricting voting? Banning books? Requiring religion to be proselytized in public schools? Telling us who we can marry?

    Not allowing dissenting views? You're here aren't you?
    And let's not forget Trump's attack on the media.
    Veteran news editor expects Trump 'to go after the press in every conceivable way'
    But you know all this. You know Trump is the one that lead an insurrection, not the Democrats, but you are willing to sell your soul for Donald Trump.

    Long live the king!
     
    scratcho likes this.
  10. newo

    newo Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    11,962
    Likes Received:
    12,322
    [​IMG]
     
    scratcho and MeAgain like this.
  11. Moon Goddess

    Moon Goddess Supporter HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    1,150
    Likes Received:
    1,759
    I found this article interesting, I put the link in the title and quoted a section of it.

    An upward spiral – how small acts of kindness and connection really can change the world, according to psychology research


    "Small acts of connection shift attitudes

    Numerous studies support the power of individual acts of connection to drive larger-scale change.

    For instance, researchers studying the political divide in the U.S. found that participants self-identifying as Democrats or Republicans “didn’t like” people in the other group largely due to negative assumptions about the other person’s morals. People also said they valued morals like fairness, respect, loyalty and a desire to prevent harm to others.

    I’m intentionally leaving out which political group preferred which traits – they all sound like positive attributes, don’t they? Even though participants thought they didn’t like each other based on politics, they also all valued traits that benefit relationships.

    One interpretation of these findings is that the more people demonstrate to each other, act by act, that they are loyal friends and community members who want to prevent harm to others, the more they might soften large-scale social and political disagreements."
     
    Piney likes this.
  12. goatrope

    goatrope Members

    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    118
    Once upon a time there was JFK, then LBJ, then RMN, then GRF, then JEC, then RWR, then GHWB. then WJC, then GWB, then BHO, then D.T.Rump
     
  13. newo

    newo Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    11,962
    Likes Received:
    12,322

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice