Now Trump has postponed any state visit to Britian, saying he won't go if there would be large-scale protests and until the British public supports him coming over. Good luck waiting for that to happen. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jun/11/donald-trump-state-visit-to-britain-put-on-hold And so, If protests keep Trumpout of Britain,then why is hestill in the U.S.?
No, MeAgain is saying that he sounds like an imbecile. And shooting him in the head will not make him speak with eloquence.
No, the point of the picture is that there are two women who were shot in the head and suffered major brain damage yet they can still think and communicate in a more logical manner than Trump, who has not suffered a traumatic head injury. I would not like to see Trump sustain any type of head injury as I assume that would only make matters worse..
Really? Some people? Big deal. Some people are idiots, some people are geniuses, so what? You say the picture implies that "some people" want Trump shot in the head. How about "some people" project their ideas of what other people are thinking when they look at a picture? Then you say the left is full of sick people. Why would you say that? Are you implying that only the left has "sick people"...if they do. Why do you think this poor women getting shot in the head is bull shit? Have you no empathy? Do you think everyone who doesn't agree with you is full of bullshit and lies?
Inspired by transgender people's current plight, and a modernized version of make love not war. FUCK, DONT FIGHT!
The ability to seek any healthcare you want can be argued as a right, however what's not a right is to force people to provide you the product of healthcare. Gun rights advocates always advocated the right to keep and bear arms. No one in the gun rights community demanded Glock to give out a gun to everyone for free.
So you think people should die if they don't have insurance through their employment and cant afford hundreds of thousands of dollars for life saving treatment? Do you think hospitals have a right to turn them away? Or do you feel this falls under the first do no harm law of healthcare? And if you do feel that hospitals are ethically bound to treat people who cant pay, who should pay for it? And speaking of employer sponsored healthcare...I'm probably pretty safe in assuming you're pro business, yes? Most conservatives support a business friendly environment. So do you think employers should continue to subsidize the bulk of their employees' healthcare? And if not, how should they pay for their insurance? Most people can't afford the entire cost of their insurance premiums. Most people probably don't even realize what a sizable chunk of it their employer pays. Stating that people don't have a right to healthcare is really easy and pretty intellectually lazy. I'm interested in the reality of the situation and how you feel the above problems should be addressed.