That neither is evidence these supplies were withheld primarily to 'hurt non white' people. You really don't see how you just connect dots because you can, not because the motive is actually true. And how this kind of stuff will make people take you far less seriously on these topics? I mean... why? People are obviously seeing through it. And there's enough factual stuff that makes Trump look bad.
Some call it artistic license. Some call it journalistic freedom. I really don't see how one writer could please all people, including someone so far away.
You shouldn't do it to please everyone or me specifically. You should do it out of integrity, because it's not needed and gives the term libtard actual merit, and it makes you a hypocrite. I'm sorry you think that's what is ment with journalistic freedom.
Who determines that it is not needed? Libtard is a term which has origins in the hearts and minds of the Alt-Right and White Nationalists; consequently, I need to ask you if you really think I give a flying fuck about that scenario?
It is not needed because they're not doing your cause a favor. As you can see even people who share your goals criticize you. Because the goals do not always justify the means. Playing the race card too easily and simply every goddamn time you can because you can connect a dot is a perfect example: it's hurting your cause instead of helping it, it adds to polarisation as people who take notice of it gets affirmed in their assumption the debate is polarized and full of fanatics argumenting their points with 'artistic liberties'. People who demonize and stereotype everyone on the right as you often do are just as much part of the polarisation problem in your country as the ones you blame.
It's a bit degrading. Just like calling somebody you hate an f...wit. What you need to do is try and not swear so much when giving your point of view. Also don't be racist. Racism is ugly. I can see why Orison is a little angry with you. It's because you don't think before you post. Take the time to think about what it is you are going to post before posting it up and getting yourself in deep strife.
He's criticized for several things but not for being racist. Until you drop in of course. Pulls your head in!
The Senate republicans are going to require John Bolton's testimony in closed door session, so the American people don't hear what he has to say. Also, they want the Democrats to deliver their speech at mid-night, so most Americans would be asleep, because it is a work week day. This comes after refusal to allow 17 witnesses from speaking during the impeachment inquiry, and the total denial of all documents. Early voting starts in 246 days.
I think you saw me criticizing that as well. But playing the racecard is accusing people of racism, not being racist. I'm not sure Suzan called that racism either, but hey i might be wrong here and you understood her correctly.
How many conservatives did this and so, how many conservatives should you accuse of this? Do you see why others have a problem with your unnuanced statements. I mean if you really think this is an example that validates your statements about all conservatives/conservatives in general. Btw: you understand that no one here is denying there are conservative white supremacists? You are at war with half of your country because you label them all as the same. That's how constructive you sound.