Trump Acquittal Thoughts?

So you finally admit that Islam is a religion and not a race. We now have it in writing. So why do you keep insinuating that it is its own separate race? How is this a valid reply to my post above?

You’re the subject of absolute ridicule and that’s why I love reading your absurdities <3

 

The only thing stormountainman has to change in his wording of muslims being the subject of racism (which is true of course, they are) is changing the word racism with discrimination. That's more accurate as they're not only or always discriminated because of their ethnic background.

 

It's based on human stupidity, just like everything else. If you want to put it on a pedestal, be my guest. It's your religion, not mine.

 

Do you have anything substantial to offer or just throwing a tantrum

 

People are stupid. Science isn't brilliant. Got a problem with that?

 

Thanks for answering my question and affirming.

 

I think there will be new Islamic Laws and you will have to surrender your AR-15

 

O … I don't know about all that. It would be nice to see them drug through the mud and have their guns confiscated. I didn't say Islam is a majority. I said it is the fastest growing religion. I think soon it will be very influential in Democratic politics, no different than say Hispanico or Negro.

 

Bro, cut the crap. You also added in that post that it will soon be the majority, BECAUSE you connect it to them being the fastest growing religion. Flawed logic:

That sounds slightly more nuanced, but you're equating them with racial groups again.

 

It's a religion, just like Judean, Samaritan, or Zoroastrianism. The term racism is used in the general sense to describe people who hate Muslims, Blacks, or Hispanic people. Most of the time I think racist people engage in the discrimination facet of racism to elevate themselves. So, white nationalists must have some sort of psychological need to feel superior for some reason. They also go and buy guns to magnify that feeling of superiority. We truly need to repeal the second amendment and take away their guns. If Mike Bloomberg will go after their guns, I'll vote for him even though he is not Muslim. (I'm not sure if he is or isn't … Muslim)

 

Science has its roots in Islam. Enlightenment in Europe has its roots in Islamic science. Islam gave America its greatest president B. Hussein Obama

 

The most accurate terms here in regards to muslims are discrimination and xenophobia. Why not use them? Adding the word ethnic in front of discrimination can narrow it down accurately as well. Insisting on using the general term 'racism', which is overly used and abused already and truthfully doesn't exactly fit here seems an unneccesary choice.

 

Science and the enlightenment movement are slightly different things. Science was a thing before islam or any european state existed.

Seems subjective and very arguable he was the greatest. But more interestingly: why is islam to thank for that?

 

it is a religion actually. You believe that science doesn’t have fables? They do, it is called a hypothesis, and these hypothesis are presented as facts in the media. When the hypothesis is Presented as factual, the people believe it as the truth, when in fact it is not, this brings in funding, money to the lab or science research. They are further looking to understand the origins, the beginning, They are looking for answers they will never have the answer to.

religion answers this, whether it be true or not, just like science.

the evidence for evolution can be fully compatible with religious faith, theAmerican National Academy of Sciences has stated this. But still, evolution is a hypothesis, which does not mean it is factual. Many stories in the bible have been used in science as well, Many stories in religious books are history books, used to teach. Many stories have been scientifically proven to be possible as well, not necessarily fiction. in order to research and understand how things could have happened. There are many interconnections between religion and science as well as parallels. Integration, Independence, Conflict, & Dialogue, both religious books, ancient history books, or philosophy writers, science today looked to understand behaviours & origins through stories and analysis or experiments or simply ideas. Science & religion both, explores the environmental & social consequence.

 

Hypothesis in science doesnt mean hypothesis that is used in general conversation. People use hypothesis as synonym for "educated guess" but in science it is an educated guess that has been proven correct through rigorous testing that can be replicated over and over. And it is then peer reviewed, scrutinized, and and tested until accepted as scientific theory. Its not a fable

 

Essence of your assertion: There are many similarities and parallels between different kind of organisations, therefor its the same kind of organisation.

edit: @Beach Ball Lady Balls

 

Evolution is not a hypothesis, it is a theory. A scientific theory is basically a cohesive explanation derived from the facts gathered from testing a hypothesis again, and again, and again

 

they still don’t know for certain. Evolutionary trees are hypotheses, not facts or theories. Sorry to tell you you believe in a fable.

 

And if other facts turn up that opposes aspects of the evolution theory they will be acknowledged.