The scientific teachings of christianity

Obviously you ignore continental drift.
*cue an incredibly dull, poorly formated, mind-numbingly dumb thesis as to why continental drift must be a hoax purpetrated by scientists on behalf of Beelzebub*

But when if comes to the bible, if something doesn't make sense,

IT'S A CHRISTMAS FUCKING MIRACLE!

 

In the March 2006 National Geographic, James Shreeve says

Scientists now calculate that all living humans are related to a single woman who lived roughly 150,000 years ago in Africa, a "mitochondrial Eve." She was not the only woman alive at the time, but if geneticists are right, all of humanity is linked to Eve through an unbroken chain of mothers. Mitochondrial Eve was soon joined by "Y chromosome Adam," an analogous father of us all, also from Africa. Increasingly refined DNA studies have confirmed this opening chapter of our story over and over: All the variously shaped and shaded people of Earth trace their ancestry to African hunter-gatherers.
​

The Shreeve article, "The Greatest Journey Ever Told", dates modern man at about 200,000 years before present. By 'modern man' he excludes the Neanderthal variant, and the much earlier australopithecus (see Lucy below).


Much more recent, at 92,000 years, is the Qafzeh (Israel) skull:

​

And much less recent, at about 3,200,000 years, is Lucy:​

​

Comparison profiles are modern man (Homo Sapiens) and chimpanzee.​

Sorry, guys, she's no longer dating.​

 

Oh woops.. you have to ignore continental drift.
Not Genesis people.
In your creation myth (evolution) there is a megamillions of years of time between continents.
Seriously.. do you know what story Evos made up when the surprise of continental drift was discovered - animals must have gotten swept away on logs and ended up across the oceans.

Cue hilarious cgi evolution story-filler cartoon for highschoolers.

 

Your cognitive dissonance is simply fascinating. You should sell your mind to science. I'm sure researchers in the field of Abnormal Psychology would pay a premium in auction for the chance to analyze your brain.

I'd also be interested to know whether they find a link between faulty logic and extreme gullibility with the inability to compose a proper paragraph.

 

Yeah, and the Sumerians wrote the story first.


Peace

 

Evolution does not explain creation, it explains evolution, as it's name clearly states.

 

Yes, I noticed that Evolutionists have surrendered on Abiogenesis.

Its kinda pathetic though.. what you are doing is asking that we just forget about how life began and just please start the debate 'after' it just must have surely happened.
Wow.
White flag waves.

 

Ikden

And occam asks for the 10th time

How was the world flooded when there is not enough water on this planet
to submerge mor than 75% of it?

You do realise that you win no arguements on this forum..
People just stop talking to you.
Why.?
Well, if you can work that out.
You aint the sharpest tool in the shed.

Occam

 

The entire planet could not be flooded if there was not enough water to do that.

You really needed someone to answer that question?
Are you daft?

 

I'm not trying to turn the topic at all; you called evolution a creation myth, I was merely clarifying that it has no relation to the origin of life.

 

Like I say - I see your white flag waving and I accept your surrender on that.
No prob.
Glad you came around.

 

LOL. At least Science is working its way, into the past, to help explain where we came from. In the race to life's past, science is millions of years ahead of creationism, which stalled at 4000 BC. You haven't even made it to the invention of the wheel.


Peace

 

Ikden

Thats what its all about for you.
Surrender to your way of thought.
But you have none. [way of thought]
That the earth is but a few thousand years old is the stuff of children and idiots.

Be honnest. you should not have said ''glad you came around'
to paintballer

You should have said

TURN OR BURN

Occam

 

*Jim and Bob sight a VW Bug*

Jim: See that? That car's in the color of a circle.

Bob: Actually, a circle is not a color, it's a shape. They aren't even related.

Jim: So, what you're really saying is that you give up on color and we should only talk about shapes, how pathetic. Well I can logically see you're surrendering.

Bob: Actually, I'm just stating that a circle is not a color and it never has been.

Jim: Like I said, glad to see you surrender and accept my way of thinking.

 

You've got Ikden described perfectly! But I want Ikden to tell us how you can form the Grand Canyon and its sediments in a few thousand years.

***************​

By the way, no Easter this year. They found the body.​

****************​

Say Ikden, is that the Luxembourg flag you show on your postings?

 

Heh, why thank you.

Pshh, Easter has nothing to do with Jesus. When the Roman church imposed Christianity upon England in the 9th century they replaced the pagan festivals with Christian holidays so as to try and remove their habitual paganism. 'Easter' is actually the pagan celebration of the summer solstice; it celebrates the Saxon godess, Eostre, which was their 'Great Mother Godess' and represented fertility. This is the same godess from various other ancient cultures around the Mediterranean, most noteably Aphrodite from ancient Cyprus.

But the real question is, where the hell did the egg-laying rabbit come from?

 

No.
Easter is a Christian Celebration of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Nobody is confused.
It doesnt have 'magic powers'.
Nobody thinks the Easter Bunnies are 'Christian powers' or any of this shit.

Seriously, how retarded do you have to be to actually think that 'pagan symbols' have some effect on anything.

Seriously though, Abiogenesis was one of the THE core intents of Evolutionism.
It is 'THE' question.
It had been from the beginning - how did life begin.
Now what your telling me is that evolutionism is abandoning it.
'nothing to do with us'.
fuck that is just hilarious to see that.
I laugh and laugh because now Evolutionists dont even want to talk about how information got to be.
They want to actually 'start' by debating it at the point everything already exists.
Wow.. just wow.
Year by year Evolutionism concedes, concedes, plea bargains and gives up point after point.
I can barely wait the 30 years until this 18th century 'science' goes the way of leeches or putting metal triangles on your head.
Quack quack.

 

Some fundamentalist groups, including many independent and Baptist churches, maintain that Easter and Christmas are of pagan origins. As such, these celebrations were originally designed to worship pagan gods, and therefore are an affront to God. To these Christians, Easter, Christmas and other festivals are extra-biblical, and therefore should not be part of Christian worship.

Occam agrees
All christian dates are hijackings of pagan rituals.
These people are the few that have their heads screwed on right.
Christianity is an affront to the human potential for logical thought.
Jesuits KNOW it.

Occam

 

30 years
LOL

So you are saying 30 years from now astronomers will all say
THE STARS WERE MADE BY GOD
They were never 2 billion years old. there are no evolved stars or galaxies
or big bang.

Occam says YOU SAY 30 years so you can escape any resolution.
and you know this is the truth.

Occam

 

Uh, actually Easter is definately a replacement of an Anglo-Saxon festival. It's actual history, denying it is just as bad as denying the Holocaust.
You know Christmas is placed over the Anglo-Saxon festival celebrating the winter solstice? It's not 100% proven, but chances are Jesus was born in Spring, not Winter.

And actually, evolution never had anything to do with the creation of life; if it had it would not be called 'evolution'. If scientists were trying to prove abiogenisis, they would probably call it 'abiogenisis'. Oh wait, they do. It's obvious you don't even understand the simplest of ideas in evolution, so please stop trying to tell us what it supposedly claims.