The real 100+ sex partners thread

While I like to watch, I know I'll never do it. The main thing I like is the vulnerability, being bossed around, demands, hands, uncontrolled that the woman has to "tolerate". It's mental and a turn on. Not in real life though.

 

Do people actually shake hands at the end of it???

 

It was my way to depict the business-like nature of a sex club. But if they do, it some damn sticky hand shakes.

 

Haha.

FTR, I've never shaken hands with anyone at mine.

 

Thanks for clearing this up! I pictured all of them lining up in a row like at the end of a little league game. You would to walk past each one and say "Good game" 18 times....

But yeah, I figured you would be pretty much done with them by the end...

 

nah.....it would be GBB's hand out, and 18 guys walking by with some low fives.

 

You realize that's almost entirely a myth, right?

If you ever have the chance, pick up a book called Sex at Dawn. It destroys the myth of supposed historical female monogamy as well. Female monogamy is a patriarchal, culturally-induced social control mechanism.

 

We have to listen to what's instinctual to ourself despite outside influences. While I know I like variety, and new, I also like companionship. My own goal is to have companionship be hot over the long term.

 

I'm afraid I can't post in this thread because the name of it isn't "The real 1,000+ sex partners thread" :biggrin:

 

I don't think anybody ever just decides one day to start doing things like that. It's always a progression from less hedonistic adventures. Some people feel peer pressure to go further than they have gone before, and others want to challenge themselves, feel the adrenaline rush of crossing a new line in the sand, and find out where their own personal boundaries lie. Step by step, you can go places you once thought impossible. You grow mentally and emotionally stronger, little by little.

The down side is that if you get addicted to that adrenaline rush, eventually you won't be able to find any more new, reasonably safe things to try. That can lead some people to disaster. Others simply take a step back. No matter what you decide, that ride has to end sometime, because there aren't an infinite number of sexual things to do.

I like knowing that I can handle semi-anonymous sex, whether or not I choose to do it that way. But I'm not chasing the novelty spiral any further than I already have.

 

Of course not. And I wouldn’t fuck you even if I was getting paid for it.

The point is I’m not the only guy who wouldn’t necessarily jump at the first notion of a girl offering herself up for a gangbang. I graduated from the “OMG I get to live out another sexual fantasy thing” long ago. Sometimes, in order to get the guys really worth having to participate, you have to bring something more to the table than just the allure of a gangbang.

I can understand girls preferring an environment like that. Honestly, I’ve never set foot in one of those “sex clubs”. Never had any desire to. The notion of people buying a membership to be a part of some little sex clique is rather lame to me. I imagine it must make people feel pretty cool when they pull out their sex club membership card and show it off to people like it's some sort of novelty

 

In a way I agree, I have never gone to a sex club, though I have been invited a few times, that just seems too clinical to me. In the private groups I am involved with we all know each other and become friends and it is more of a social than business-like interaction. Most of the time we go in not really knowing how the night will progress, its just a fun and games lets see what happens mentality. Not to say it is totally unplanned, we do themed parties and fetish specific things, but it is very relaxed and you never know what will come up. My last bukkake started as a girl-girl exhibition that ended up with several "volunteers from the audience" being brought into the mix. One of the great things about being friends with everyone is knowing their specific interests and their boundaries and having a level of respect for that within the group. There is no pressure to do anything you don't want to do, and always someone willing to do anything you want to do

 

I can assure you they're anything but clinical. They're just as relaxed and accommodating as your "social group." In fact, I'd argue that they're not unlike your "social group" at all aside from the fact the pool of potential play partners is much, much wider.

 

I would assume that no two are exactly alike. If I was single and living near a sex club, I wouldn't rule it out before looking into it. I've never lived anywhere that such things were available to adults after college.

 

Maybe so, but I tend to agree that it would probably depend on the club. As I said, I have never gone to one, it is just the concept that seems clinical, and I have to doubt it is the same environment as a group of well known friends, excepting that I am sure some regulars do develop similar relationships. I would still rather play in my basement or a friends house, etc. And finding enough partners has certainly never been an issue

 

You've admittedly never gone to one, yet you feel qualified to offer an opinion on what some of them might be like?

That's not even remotely the point.

 

I've heard of this one establishment somewhere in San Francisco, CA I think where women run this kinda of sex party place, but men have to be invited by a female guest to get into the place.

Rules are the guys can't initiate anything on the girls, but if the guy is going to get lucky a girl, or more than one girl, in that environment has to pretty much snatch him up for a romp or two or whatever she wants.


Have any of you heard of a place like that? I forgot the name and heard it on a podcast initially.

 

I've not heard of that specific kind of arrangement, but there are dozens of sex clubs in SF. And in many cases, if you're a single male you do have to be invited/brought/accompanied by either a single female (in which, you really aren't "single" any longer), or a couple. Or at the very least you have to be sponsored by someone who's already a member.

They have to do that to prevent the clubs from being overwhelmed by single guys. Usually, members pay an annual fee, and then a per party fee of some kind. Unless you're a single female. Single females can get in free at a lot of clubs, or at least at a much reduced rate.

 

For anyone who'd like to get an idea of what the clubs are really like, Google the Pleasure Garden in Philadelphia, Tabu in Baltimore, and Entre Nous in Washington, DC. You can tell by looking at their web sites, they're hardly anything approaching "clinical."

 

Why yes, I am in fact fully qualified to formulate my own personal opinion of how the concept seems to me and to formulate an opinion from the descriptions of members who have invited me that those are in fact not at all like my groups, and different from what you apparently have experienced, and by extension assume that different ones would be different; that particular assumption rings true in pretty much everything regardless.

And you brought up breadth of partner pools, not me, I simply responded