It was not directed at anyone or I would of made it so. It was simply an observation not an accusation.
I think that was exactly what I said that people do form a clique but that it was not always in a negative way. There is a grouping based on common and that does not have to be a negative at all... With cliques if most sit back and wait, they tend to destroy themselves given time as that is also human nature. Any other issue is yours as that was not what I stated nor meant as I have already posted. As I said, it is and how you chose to read my statement, not my statement in itself. *edit.....my spelling sucks.....sorry
I wouldn't mind people calling each other by their first names, it's just when I am trying to follow along in a thread, it gets confusing if I don't know people's first names, and then I can't tell who they are addressing in their posts. Otherwise, I have nothing against it. Love, Diana
but kc... you should know that dilli and her man think that many of us have the mentality of a typical 12-yr.-old. nothing new or unexpected there.
thank you marc. (haha i said marc not olhippie.... gotta love it!) you're always there to lighten the mood. love ya babe!
Okay I posted about the clique thing and somehow that has been viewed as being negative and while it can be as it can skew what is stated sometimes by someone out of that loyal thing ......I, in no way meant for it to get off track or become a sling thing. I do think that we all form cliques but that some are not healthy and some are as if they are honest support then there is nothing more productive. I do not wish my words to be used against another poster. I made that statement not anyone else. I really think I was clear on what I meant and said and the negative was not implied nor meant.........it was simply an observation that as humans we do form cliques. Nothing more or less.